project-one-slider
Skill1 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create a single-slide, evidence-backed executive project summary from a local folder or repository and produce an editable PPTX artifact. Use when asked for a one-slider, one-slide executive summary, project summary slide, architecture summary slide, project work summary, or exactly one PowerPoint slide based on project files. Do not use for a multi-slide presentation unless the user explicitly asks to expand the scope.
In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- decision-plannerSkill
- diagrammingSkill
- project-executionSkill
- project-understandingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Do not invent facts, metrics, outcomes, users, deployments, timelines, or business impact.
- Very specific: line 20
Use $project-understanding when available for a large or unfamiliar repository, but keep this skill responsible for executive selection and …
- Distinctive: line 45
Use no more than five content zones and no more than 22 short bullets.
- Distinctive: line 68
Read references/layouts.md to select the visual structure.
- Distinctive: line 72
Prefer an already-available maintained PPTX skill, presentation workspace, or project-native generator.
- Distinctive: line 74
If no presentation backend is available:
- Very specific: line 76
Check for an existing project-native slide tool or python-pptx.
- Distinctive: line 78
If a new dependency or global installation is required, explain it and obtain authorization.
- Very specific: line 79
Keep any fallback generator deterministic and local to one-slider/.
- Distinctive: line 81
Do not silently modify the project's dependency manifest for a one-off presentation.
- Distinctive: line 87
Follow references/pptx-qa.md.
- Distinctive: line 94
Check clipping, overlap, legibility, alignment, and font-size consistency.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project One-Slider
Decide what the slide should say; delegate generic PowerPoint mechanics to an available maintained PPTX skill or presentation tool.
Evidence standard
Do not invent facts, metrics, outcomes, users, deployments, timelines, or business impact. Label gaps as:
Not found in local filesInferred from code/configNeeds user confirmation
Inspect the repository's current evidence: local instructions, README/docs, manifests and configuration, entry points, tests, reports, notebooks, assets/screenshots, deployment files, and version-control state when available. Prefer executable configuration and current source over stale prose. Cite paths in the evidence brief.
Use $project-understanding when available for a large or unfamiliar repository, but keep this skill responsible for executive selection and compression.
Build the story
Extract:
- Project and audience.
- User/business problem.
- What was built.
- Three to five load-bearing components or workflow steps.
- Current status.
- Demonstrated impact or qualitative capability.
- Important gap, risk, or next action.
Choose one defensible headline: <Project>: <outcome-oriented statement>. Avoid generic claims such as “leveraging cutting-edge AI.”
Produce the content
Create:
one-slider/project_brief.md— evidence, uncertainties, and selected story.one-slider/slide_copy.md— final copy only.one-slider/slide.mmdwhen a diagram improves comprehension.one-slider/<project>_one_slider.pptx— exactly one slide.
Use no more than five content zones and no more than 22 short bullets. Prefer labels, metrics, compact tables, and workflow nodes over paragraphs. A nontechnical reader should understand the problem and outcome; a technical reader should recognize the real architecture.
Recommended copy:
# <Project>: <Outcome>
## Problem
- <1–2 bullets>
## Solution
- <2–3 bullets>
## Architecture / Workflow
- <3–5 steps or components>
## Impact / Current Evidence
- <2–3 evidence-backed bullets>
## Next Steps
- <2–3 concrete bullets>Read references/layouts.md to select the visual structure.
Create the PPTX
Prefer an already-available maintained PPTX skill, presentation workspace, or project-native generator. Supply it with the evidence brief, final copy, selected layout, visual assets, and the hard requirement of exactly one editable 16:9 slide.
If no presentation backend is available:
- Check for an existing project-native slide tool or
python-pptx. - Reuse it when present.
- If a new dependency or global installation is required, explain it and obtain authorization.
- Keep any fallback generator deterministic and local to
one-slider/.
Do not silently modify the project's dependency manifest for a one-off presentation.
Use $diagramming when available for architecture/workflow source. Render it to an image before embedding when the PPTX backend cannot render Mermaid natively. Prefer relevant project-owned screenshots or images over generic decoration. A logo or decorative icon alone does not satisfy the meaningful-visual requirement; the primary visual must communicate workflow, architecture, evidence, status, or risk.
Verify the artifact
Follow references/pptx-qa.md. At minimum:
- Confirm the file is a valid PPTX package.
- Confirm exactly one slide.
- Confirm all intended images are embedded.
- Confirm every shape is inside the 16:9 bounds.
- Render or inspect the slide visually when a viewer or rendering tool is available.
- Check clipping, overlap, legibility, alignment, and font-size consistency.
- Confirm every displayed metric or status traces to the evidence brief.
Report Structural QA and Visual QA separately. XML coordinates and slide bounds do not prove that text is unclipped, readable, or well composed. If no rendered slide or presentation view was inspected, write Visual QA: not performed and do not claim that overlap, clipping, or visual balance passed.
Deliver
Report:
- The selected story and layout.
- Clickable paths to the brief, copy, diagram, and PPTX.
- Validation actually performed.
- Missing evidence or claims that still need confirmation.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

