agentleFS
ArogyaReddyArogyaReddy/https-github.com-affaan-m-everything-claude-code1/AGENTS.md

https-github.com-affaan-m-everything-claude-code1

AGENTS.md2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

This is a production-ready AI coding plugin providing 48 specialized agents, 183 skills, 79 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development. Version: 1.10.0 Use agents proactively without user prompt: - Complex feature requests → planner - Code just written/modified → code-reviewer - Bug fix or new feature → tdd-guide - Architectural decision → architect - Security-sensitive code → security-reviewer - Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → loop-operator - Harness config reliability and cost → harness-optimizer Use parallel execution for…

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 3 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈3

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use agents proactively without user prompt:

    line 48
  2. Distinctive:

    Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.

    line 57
  3. Common:

    No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)

    line 62
  4. Distinctive:

    All user inputs validated

    line 63
  5. Common:

    Secret management: NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager.

    line 71
  6. Common:

    If security issue found: STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar …

    line 73
  7. Distinctive:

    Immutability (CRITICAL): Always create new objects, never mutate.

    line 77
  8. Distinctive:

    No deep nesting (>4 levels)

    line 87
  9. Distinctive:

    Test types (all required):

    line 95
  10. Distinctive:

    Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL

    line 101
  11. Distinctive:

    Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS

    line 102
  12. Distinctive:

    If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere

    line 115
  13. Distinctive:

    If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file

    line 116
  14. Distinctive:

    Skeleton projects: Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best …

    line 137
  15. Distinctive:

    Context management: Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features.

    line 141
  16. Distinctive:

    Build troubleshooting: Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.

    line 143
  17. Distinctive:

    All tests pass with 80%+ coverage

    line 162

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 36,368 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Everything Claude Code (ECC) — Agent Instructions

This is a production-ready AI coding plugin providing 48 specialized agents, 183 skills, 79 commands, and automated hook workflows for software development.

Version: 1.10.0

Core Principles

  1. Agent-First — Delegate to specialized agents for domain tasks
  2. Test-Driven — Write tests before implementation, 80%+ coverage required
  3. Security-First — Never compromise on security; validate all inputs
  4. Immutability — Always create new objects, never mutate existing ones
  5. Plan Before Execute — Plan complex features before writing code

Available Agents

AgentPurposeWhen to Use
plannerImplementation planningComplex features, refactoring
architectSystem design and scalabilityArchitectural decisions
tdd-guideTest-driven developmentNew features, bug fixes
code-reviewerCode quality and maintainabilityAfter writing/modifying code
security-reviewerVulnerability detectionBefore commits, sensitive code
build-error-resolverFix build/type errorsWhen build fails
e2e-runnerEnd-to-end Playwright testingCritical user flows
refactor-cleanerDead code cleanupCode maintenance
doc-updaterDocumentation and codemapsUpdating docs
cpp-reviewerC/C++ code reviewC and C++ projects
cpp-build-resolverC/C++ build errorsC and C++ build failures
docs-lookupDocumentation lookup via Context7API/docs questions
go-reviewerGo code reviewGo projects
go-build-resolverGo build errorsGo build failures
kotlin-reviewerKotlin code reviewKotlin/Android/KMP projects
kotlin-build-resolverKotlin/Gradle build errorsKotlin build failures
database-reviewerPostgreSQL/Supabase specialistSchema design, query optimization
python-reviewerPython code reviewPython projects
java-reviewerJava and Spring Boot code reviewJava/Spring Boot projects
java-build-resolverJava/Maven/Gradle build errorsJava build failures
loop-operatorAutonomous loop executionRun loops safely, monitor stalls, intervene
harness-optimizerHarness config tuningReliability, cost, throughput
rust-reviewerRust code reviewRust projects
rust-build-resolverRust build errorsRust build failures
pytorch-build-resolverPyTorch runtime/CUDA/training errorsPyTorch build/training failures
typescript-reviewerTypeScript/JavaScript code reviewTypeScript/JavaScript projects

Agent Orchestration

Use agents proactively without user prompt:

  • Complex feature requests → planner
  • Code just written/modified → code-reviewer
  • Bug fix or new feature → tdd-guide
  • Architectural decision → architect
  • Security-sensitive code → security-reviewer
  • Autonomous loops / loop monitoring → loop-operator
  • Harness config reliability and cost → harness-optimizer

Use parallel execution for independent operations — launch multiple agents simultaneously.

Security Guidelines

Before ANY commit:

  • No hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
  • All user inputs validated
  • SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
  • XSS prevention (sanitized HTML)
  • CSRF protection enabled
  • Authentication/authorization verified
  • Rate limiting on all endpoints
  • Error messages don't leak sensitive data

Secret management: NEVER hardcode secrets. Use environment variables or a secret manager. Validate required secrets at startup. Rotate any exposed secrets immediately.

If security issue found: STOP → use security-reviewer agent → fix CRITICAL issues → rotate exposed secrets → review codebase for similar issues.

Coding Style

Immutability (CRITICAL): Always create new objects, never mutate. Return new copies with changes applied.

File organization: Many small files over few large ones. 200-400 lines typical, 800 max. Organize by feature/domain, not by type. High cohesion, low coupling.

Error handling: Handle errors at every level. Provide user-friendly messages in UI code. Log detailed context server-side. Never silently swallow errors.

Input validation: Validate all user input at system boundaries. Use schema-based validation. Fail fast with clear messages. Never trust external data.

Code quality checklist:

  • Functions small (<50 lines), files focused (<800 lines)
  • No deep nesting (>4 levels)
  • Proper error handling, no hardcoded values
  • Readable, well-named identifiers

Testing Requirements

Minimum coverage: 80%

Test types (all required):

  1. Unit tests — Individual functions, utilities, components
  2. Integration tests — API endpoints, database operations
  3. E2E tests — Critical user flows

TDD workflow (mandatory):

  1. Write test first (RED) — test should FAIL
  2. Write minimal implementation (GREEN) — test should PASS
  3. Refactor (IMPROVE) — verify coverage 80%+

Troubleshoot failures: check test isolation → verify mocks → fix implementation (not tests, unless tests are wrong).

Development Workflow

  1. Plan — Use planner agent, identify dependencies and risks, break into phases
  2. TDD — Use tdd-guide agent, write tests first, implement, refactor
  3. Review — Use code-reviewer agent immediately, address CRITICAL/HIGH issues
  4. Capture knowledge in the right place
    • Personal debugging notes, preferences, and temporary context → auto memory
    • Team/project knowledge (architecture decisions, API changes, runbooks) → the project's existing docs structure
    • If the current task already produces the relevant docs or code comments, do not duplicate the same information elsewhere
    • If there is no obvious project doc location, ask before creating a new top-level file
  5. Commit — Conventional commits format, comprehensive PR summaries

Workflow Surface Policy

  • skills/ is the canonical workflow surface.
  • New workflow contributions should land in skills/ first.
  • commands/ is a legacy slash-entry compatibility surface and should only be added or updated when a shim is still required for migration or cross-harness parity.

Git Workflow

Commit format: <type>: <description> — Types: feat, fix, refactor, docs, test, chore, perf, ci

PR workflow: Analyze full commit history → draft comprehensive summary → include test plan → push with -u flag.

Architecture Patterns

API response format: Consistent envelope with success indicator, data payload, error message, and pagination metadata.

Repository pattern: Encapsulate data access behind standard interface (findAll, findById, create, update, delete). Business logic depends on abstract interface, not storage mechanism.

Skeleton projects: Search for battle-tested templates, evaluate with parallel agents (security, extensibility, relevance), clone best match, iterate within proven structure.

Performance

Context management: Avoid last 20% of context window for large refactoring and multi-file features. Lower-sensitivity tasks (single edits, docs, simple fixes) tolerate higher utilization.

Build troubleshooting: Use build-error-resolver agent → analyze errors → fix incrementally → verify after each fix.

Project Structure

agents/          — 48 specialized subagents
skills/          — 183 workflow skills and domain knowledge
commands/        — 79 slash commands
hooks/           — Trigger-based automations
rules/           — Always-follow guidelines (common + per-language)
scripts/         — Cross-platform Node.js utilities
mcp-configs/     — 14 MCP server configurations
tests/           — Test suite

commands/ remains in the repo for compatibility, but the long-term direction is skills-first.

Success Metrics

  • All tests pass with 80%+ coverage
  • No security vulnerabilities
  • Code is readable and maintainable
  • Performance is acceptable
  • User requirements are met

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.