agentleFS
ArcticFox2029ArcticFox2029/chamnan/skills/milestone/SKILL.md

milestone

Skill10 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub

Record a change that reshaped the repository — what moved, why it was worth doing, and which areas it touched. Use after a migration, a rewrite, or a decision that changed how part of the system works.

9 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Leave out a field rather than filling it with a dash.

    line 60
  2. Distinctive:

    Write the *why* as the problem, not the activity.

    line 62
  3. Distinctive:

    Only the two most recent titles, with their dates.

    line 68
  4. Very specific:

    No incident write-ups. Name the failure in one clause.

    line 76
  5. Distinctive:

    Not pruned by age, on purpose — the oldest entry is usually the one nobody can reconstruct.

    line 80

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Record a milestone

A git log says what changed. It rarely says why the change was worth making, and never says which areas moved together. Six months later that is what somebody needs — usually while deciding whether they are allowed to undo it.

When to write one

For a change big enough that a newcomer would ask "why is this part like that?"

  • a migration — a database, an auth model, a framework
  • a rewrite of a module, or a service split in two
  • a design reversal: something was done one way, then deliberately undone

Roughly a handful a year on an active repository. If you are writing one a week, they are commits, not milestones, and the file stops being readable.

When not to

  • A task, or something in progress. That is STATE.md, or a session record.
  • A single decision with no structural change. That is /chamnan:remember → .chamnan/memory/decisions/.
  • A repeated procedure. That is /chamnan:capture.
  • Anything with a status, an owner, or a due date. This is not project management, and adding those fields would quietly turn it into a worse version of a tool you already have.

Where it goes

.chamnan/milestones.md

One file, and entries are appended at the end. Newest last is deliberate: appending keeps every diff to added lines, where prepending would rewrite the context of the whole file each time.

The format

## 2026-08-20 — Authentication migration

**Why:** sessions dropped under load; the old design held state per node.
**Affected:** auth module, API layer
**Decisions:** short-lived tokens; the old endpoint stays for one release

Four parts, and the middle two carry the value:

Date and titleISO date, then a short name for the change
WhyThe problem that made it worth doing. Not "we migrated auth" — what was going wrong.
AffectedWhich areas moved together. This is what nobody can reconstruct later.
DecisionsChoices made along the way, especially anything ruled out.

Leave out a field rather than filling it with a dash.

Write the why as the problem, not the activity. "Migrated to short-lived tokens" is the diff restated; "sessions dropped under load because the old design held state per node" is the reason, and it is the half that stops somebody re-treading it.

What reaches a session

Only the two most recent titles, with their dates. The bodies stay in the file, and the agent reads it when a title looks relevant. So a repository with forty milestones costs the same per session as one with two.

What not to put in it

  • No credentials, hostnames or connection strings. This file is committed. The session-start hook redacts what it injects; that does not clean the file on disk.
  • No incident write-ups. Name the failure in one clause; a post-mortem belongs in docs/.

Housekeeping

Not pruned by age, on purpose — the oldest entry is usually the one nobody can reconstruct. Because only titles are injected, length costs nothing per session. Edit an entry if it turns out to be wrong; a false milestone is worse than a missing one.

Set "milestones": false in .chamnan/config.json to switch it off.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.