handoff
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Start a new Codex chat with the complete material context from the current work when the user asks for a handoff, a fresh continuation chat, or everything worked on, researched, explored, validated, and verified.
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xiaoxiaosrm/dsh-mattpocock-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ethosagent/ethostheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- glebis/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use decision-mapping, setup-ts-deep-modules and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 8 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 42 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 93 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 87 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 51 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 54 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- ykdojo/claude-code-tips★ 10ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- aws-local-preflightSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- feature-branch-lifecycleSkill
- humanizerSkill
- impeccableSkill
- legacy-path-retirementSkill
- local-ci-preflightSkill
- multi-role-repo-reviewSkill
- multi-session-coordinationSkill
- platform-documentationSkill
- production-api-integrationSkill
- production-architecture-reviewSkill
- production-code-qualitySkill
- production-database-integritySkill
- production-devops-releaseSkill
- production-documentation-onboardingSkill
- production-pass-orchestratorSkill
- production-performance-reviewSkill
- production-readiness-reportSkill
- production-reliability-observabilitySkill
- production-security-reviewSkill
- production-testing-qaSkill
- production-ux-accessibilitySkill
- reference-doc-routingSkill
- senior-code-reviewSkill
- session-cleanupSkill
- subagent-orchestrationSkill
- task-graph-orchestrationSkill
- taste-new-websiteSkill
- taste-redesign-websiteSkill
- technical-debt-auditorSkill
- worktree-lifecycleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Before composing the handoff:
- Distinctive: line 16
Treat the completed conversation, repository, connected services, memory, and user statements as distinct evidence sources.
- Distinctive: line 21
Read references/context-contract.md before assembling the context package.
- Distinctive: line 41
Create a fresh chat with a self-contained context package.
- Distinctive: line 48
If no thread-creation capability exists, provide one self-contained copy-paste prompt and say clearly that the chat was not created.
- Distinctive: line 52
Do not claim success from a create response alone.
- Distinctive: line 54
Read the new thread and confirm the context prompt is present.
- Distinctive: line 57
Ensure the new prompt tells the next agent to recheck live state before acting.
- Distinctive: line 58
Ensure no underlying merge, deployment, report launch, cloud mutation, publication, or destructive action started automatically.
- Distinctive: line 59
Do not archive or delete the source thread unless the user separately asks.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Handoff
Move the current work into a new chat without losing decisions, evidence, failures, workspace state, or the real next gate. When Codex app thread tools are available, actually create, verify, and open the new chat; do not stop at drafting a prompt.
The request to start a new chat authorizes thread creation, context seeding, titling, and navigation. It does not authorize code changes, merge, deployment, external publication, cloud mutation, destructive cleanup, or continuing the underlying project work.
Establish Current Truth
Before composing the handoff:
- Treat the completed conversation, repository, connected services, memory, and user statements as distinct evidence sources.
- Recheck cheap drift-prone facts that materially affect the next chat: repository path, branch/ref, commit, upstream, dirty state, PR/check/review status, deployment state, active worktree, and relevant external access state.
- Preserve the distinction between verified current, user-reported, historical, and unverified facts. Never upgrade source changes, a merge, or prior test output into deployed acceptance.
- Preserve unrelated local work. Record dirty or user-owned paths without cleaning, resetting, moving, staging, or overwriting them.
Read references/context-contract.md before assembling the context package.
Build the Context Package
Include all material context needed to continue correctly, not a transcript dump. Capture:
- the objective and current verdict;
- work completed and its exact artifacts;
- research, experiments, alternatives, and causal findings;
- validations run, exact outcomes, warnings, and evidence boundaries;
- user decisions, approvals, rejected approaches, and non-negotiable invariants;
- repository, worktree, branch, PR, release, and external-system anchors;
- failures, dead ends, pre-existing defects, and why they were classified that way;
- unresolved risks, missing evidence, and the precise next gate;
- authorization boundaries and actions the new chat must not infer.
Use exact file paths, identifiers, commits, PRs, run IDs, test counts, and evidence locators when they materially prevent rediscovery or mistakes. Remove repetition and conversational noise. Never include credentials, tokens, private keys, session cookies, sign-in links, device codes, secret values, customer prose, or unnecessary sensitive payloads.
Create the New Chat
Create a fresh chat with a self-contained context package. A fork carries prior history and is not a fresh handoff. Use this order:
- Select the project safely: List projects first and match the current repository by exact path. Use the host's supported default environment. Create a worktree only when the user explicitly requests one and the project is a Git repository. Specify a starting state only when the user requests it: current working-tree state or a verified branch/ref. Otherwise use the host's default starting state. Never invent a branch.
- Create the thread: Seed a fresh project thread with the complete context package and a clear next gate.
- Handle asynchronous creation: A create action may return a
clientThreadIdwhile setup is pending. Never pass it to a tool that requires a realthreadId. Poll/list threads and identify the new one from its requested title, project, path, creation time, and summary. Avoid creating a duplicate while setup is in progress. - Title and open it: Give the thread a short, unambiguous title, then navigate the app to that thread.
If no thread-creation capability exists, provide one self-contained copy-paste prompt and say clearly that the chat was not created. Create a workspace handoff file only when the user requests one or when a durable artifact is necessary and the destination is safe.
Verify the Handoff
Do not claim success from a create response alone.
- Read the new thread and confirm the context prompt is present.
- Confirm the thread has a real
threadId, expected workspace/project, and requested title. - Confirm it is active, ready, or has produced its acknowledgement.
- Ensure the new prompt tells the next agent to recheck live state before acting.
- Ensure no underlying merge, deployment, report launch, cloud mutation, publication, or destructive action started automatically.
- Do not archive or delete the source thread unless the user separately asks.
Finish with a concise confirmation naming the new thread and its ID.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

