production-documentation-onboarding
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review and improve documentation for production readiness and developer onboarding, including README accuracy, setup instructions, environment variables, testing, build, deployment, architecture overview, troubleshooting, contribution guidance, known risks, release notes, and handoff documentation. Use when a production pass needs documentation review or when setup, testing, deployment, architecture, or troubleshooting documentation is missing or stale.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ArcanEdge-AI/coding-agent-playbook-codexedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- ArcanEdge-AI/coding-agent-playbook-codex★ 399% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository28 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- aws-local-preflightSkill
- feature-branch-lifecycleSkill
- handoffSkill
- legacy-path-retirementSkill
- local-ci-preflightSkill
- multi-role-repo-reviewSkill
- multi-session-coordinationSkill
- platform-documentationSkill
- production-api-integrationSkill
- production-architecture-reviewSkill
- production-code-qualitySkill
- production-database-integritySkill
- production-devops-releaseSkill
- production-pass-orchestratorSkill
- production-performance-reviewSkill
- production-readiness-reportSkill
- production-reliability-observabilitySkill
- production-security-reviewSkill
- production-testing-qaSkill
- production-ux-accessibilitySkill
- reference-doc-routingSkill
- senior-code-reviewSkill
- session-cleanupSkill
- subagent-orchestrationSkill
- task-graph-orchestrationSkill
- technical-debt-auditorSkill
- worktree-lifecycleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 51
When documentation changes are requested or part of authorized remediation, update them to reflect real commands and project structure.
- Distinctive: line 52
Do not invent setup steps that are not supported by the repository.
- Distinctive: line 68
Do not document guessed commands as facts.
- Distinctive: line 69
Do not expose secret values.
- Distinctive: line 70
Do not over-document obvious details.
- Distinctive: line 71
Do not replace useful existing docs without preserving important content.
- Distinctive: line 72
Keep documentation practical and developer-facing.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Production Documentation Onboarding
Core purpose
Make the repository easier to run, test, deploy, maintain, and hand off.
Use this skill when
- The production pass needs documentation review.
- The user wants the repository understandable for future developers.
- Setup, testing, deployment, architecture, or troubleshooting documentation is missing or stale.
Do not use this skill when
- The task is only code implementation.
- The user explicitly asks not to change docs.
- Documentation cannot be grounded in repository files.
Check for
- README accuracy
- Local setup instructions
- Environment variable documentation
- Test instructions
- Build instructions
- Deployment instructions
- Architecture overview
- Troubleshooting notes
- Contribution guidelines
- Known risks and limitations
- Release checklist references
- Manual QA instructions
- Onboarding instructions
- Dependency installation notes
- Database setup notes
- Migration instructions
Default workflow
Resolve the task mode first: assessment-only work reports findings without source, test, or repository-document edits; authorized remediation applies only in-scope fixes. Release, production, and destructive operations retain their separate authority requirements.
- Inspect existing documentation.
- Compare docs against actual repository scripts and configuration.
- Identify missing or stale instructions.
- Classify documentation gaps as Blocker, High, Medium, or Low.
- When documentation changes are requested or part of authorized remediation, update them to reflect real commands and project structure. Assessment-only requests report gaps and proposed text.
- Do not invent setup steps that are not supported by the repository.
- Report documentation gaps in the requested format; create or update
DOCUMENTATION_GAPS.mdonly when that artifact is in scope. - Link to production-readiness files where helpful.
Severity guidance
Classify as Blocker when missing documentation prevents safe setup, deployment, release, or rollback.
Classify as High when missing documentation creates serious release or onboarding risk.
Classify as Medium when documentation should improve soon but does not block release.
Classify as Low for optional clarity or polish.
Guardrails
- Do not document guessed commands as facts.
- Do not expose secret values.
- Do not over-document obvious details.
- Do not replace useful existing docs without preserving important content.
- Keep documentation practical and developer-facing.
- Document unknowns honestly.
Deliverables
Include the following in the requested assessment response or report. Update repository readiness files only when those artifacts are requested or part of authorized remediation:
- Documentation readiness summary
- README updates where needed
- Environment variable names and purpose
- Setup, test, build, and deployment notes
- Remaining documentation gaps
- Files changed and reasons
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

