deep-analysis
Skill8 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user wants to continue from a digest item, asks for a deeper event breakdown, or replies with a visible digest number for a configured topic. Trigger for Chinese requests like "展开第 3 条", "这个详细说说", "继续分析 2", or "这件事可信吗".
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pfangueiro/claude-code-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Companytheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- GregorStocks/mage-benchtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- wbh604/UZI-Skilltheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Companytheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- Serennity007/uzi-skilltheir own version, first seen Aug 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use community-led-growth, ph-community-outreach and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillmicro-saas-launcher
Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.
Also in 5 projects that use this
mastepanoskiSkillux-audit-rethink
Comprehensive UX audit using IxDF's 7 factors, 5 usability characteristics, and 5 interaction dimensions. Holistic evaluation with redesign proposals based on user-centered design principles.
Also in 5 projects that use this
ncklrsSkillseo-content-strategist
Expert SEO content strategy for SaaS and B2B sites. Use when doing keyword research, planning content clusters, creating pillar pages, optimizing on-page SEO, fixing technical SEO issues, building links, refreshing content, implementing programmatic SEO, mapping search intent, optimizing for SERP features, or measuring content performance. Use for SEO audits, content gap analysis, and organic growth strategy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
hieutrtrSkillcode-review-security
Security-focused code review checklist and automated scanning patterns. Use when reviewing pull requests for security issues, auditing authentication/authorization code, checking for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities, or validating input sanitization. Covers SQL injection prevention, XSS protection, CSRF tokens, authentication flow review, secrets detection, dependency vulnerability scanning, and secure coding patterns for Python (FastAPI) and React. Does NOT cover deployment security (use docker-best-practices) or incident handling (use incident-response).
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +6 more from nicepkg
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- wbh604/UZI-Skill★ 7.6ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company★ 3.2ksame name
- nicepkg/auto-company★ 188same name
- GregorStocks/mage-bench★ 69same name
- NikitaDmitrieff/auto-co-meta★ 43same name
- taxueseek/session-digger★ 34same name
- ligenjian001-ai/agent-skills★ 8same name
- pfangueiro/claude-code-agents★ 7same name
- microsoft/code-optimizations-skills★ 5same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- verify-skryaSkill
- digestSkill
- request-curationSkill
- skryaSkill
- source-curationSkill
- topic-curationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
9
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Always resolve an explicit internal topic-id before reading files, but do not ask nontechnical users for raw ids when the current topic or …
- Very specific: line 12
Before reading topic files or stored digest artifacts, resolve the Skrya data root.
- Distinctive: line 16
Read these files before starting:
- Distinctive: line 22
If available, also read the latest digest output and the stored event context for the referenced event.
- Distinctive: line 37
If the user only replies with a number, interpret it as the news number in the same received digest.
- Distinctive: line 43
Do not show source lists in the normal analysis output.
- Distinctive: line 44
Keep traceability so that if the user asks for sources afterward, you can return them.
- Distinctive: line 46
Keep the tone analytical and natural, not templated.
- Distinctive: line 62
Use this shape by default:
- Distinctive: line 71
Do not mechanically print these as stiff report labels if a smoother structure reads better, but make sure all six jobs are covered.
- Distinctive: line 75
If the user asks for the sources behind the analysis, return the relevant source list for the analyzed event.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- AUTO-GENERATED from deep-analysis/SKILL.md.tmpl; regenerate with `python -m skrya_orchestrator.main build-skill-pack --root . --host all` -->Deep Analysis
Analyze one specific event for a resolved Skrya topic.
Always resolve an explicit internal topic-id before reading files, but do not ask nontechnical users for raw ids when the current topic or natural topic name is clear.
Before reading topic files or stored digest artifacts, resolve the Skrya data root. Topic configuration and generated artifacts live under <skrya-data-root>/, not necessarily under the skill repository.
Read First
Read these files before starting:
<skrya-data-root>/topics/<topic-id>/topic.json<skrya-data-root>/topics/<topic-id>/brief.json<skrya-data-root>/topics/<topic-id>/deep-analysis.md
If available, also read the latest digest output and the stored event context for the referenced event.
Also inherit any applicable workspace defaults from AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, or the equivalent repository instruction file.
Accepted Inputs
Accept either:
dig: N-xxfor one news item, resolved from the received card or explicit digest artifact.dig: T-xxfor the complete Thread archive, not only displayed milestones.write: T-xxfor a sourced article draft based on the complete Thread history. Do not automatically publish.- a specific event description that is sufficient to locate the event.
In channel-aware hosts, resolve the topic and current binding first. Use skrya resolve-reference --topic <topic-id> --binding <binding-id> --reference <N-xx-or-T-xx> --message-id <replied-message-id>. Omit message ID only when using that binding's latest complete successful delivery. Never use an unrelated channel's snapshot or the latest generated digest.
For local non-channel conversations, use skrya resolve-reference --topic <topic-id> --artifact <digest-file> --reference <N-xx-or-T-xx>.
If the user only replies with a number, interpret it as the news number in the same received digest. If no snapshot or topic can be resolved, ask a short clarification instead of guessing.
For write: T-xx, read the resolved entity's full timeline, sources, topic brief and deep-analysis guidance. Write an article with a clear argument, chronological context, source citations and explicit uncertainty. Save the completed draft under <skrya-data-root>/runs/<topic-id>/articles/ using a timestamped Markdown filename. This is an agent writing workflow, not a publishing command.
Output Rules
- Do not show source lists in the normal analysis output.
- Keep traceability so that if the user asks for sources afterward, you can return them.
- Focus on event understanding, not article summarization.
- Keep the tone analytical and natural, not templated.
- Be explicit about uncertainty.
- File names are internal execution details; do not show file names in normal user-facing replies unless the user asks for implementation details.
Required Behavior
- Resolve the target event.
- Gather the relevant items and supporting context for that event.
- Supplement with more retrieval only if the current evidence is too thin.
- Reconstruct the event timeline.
- Separate agreed facts from disputed claims.
- Judge current credibility and uncertainty.
- End with what is worth watching next.
Default Structure
Use this shape by default:
- Brief conclusion
- Event overview
- Timeline or development arc
- Cross-source synthesis
- Credibility judgment
- What to watch next
Do not mechanically print these as stiff report labels if a smoother structure reads better, but make sure all six jobs are covered.
Source Follow-up
If the user asks for the sources behind the analysis, return the relevant source list for the analyzed event.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

