agentleFS
ArcQian-bitArcQian-bit/codex-real-engineer-skills/skills/perf-lab/SKILL.md

perf-lab

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Diagnose and improve performance with measurements. Use when the user asks about slow code, latency, throughput, memory, bundle size, database query cost, rendering jank, profiling, benchmarking, or optimization. Do not use for correctness bugs unless the main symptom is performance.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If measurement is blocked, state the missing fixture, traffic shape, or profiler access instead of guessing.

    line 38

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Perf Lab

Optimize only after creating a measurement loop.

Workflow

  1. Define the target metric: latency, throughput, memory, CPU, query count, bundle size, render frames, or startup time.
  2. Build a baseline using the repo's tools first: benchmark, profiler, logs, trace, query plan, browser performance panel, or a focused script.
  3. Reproduce the slow path with representative data.
  4. Rank hypotheses by likely impact and cost.
  5. Change one variable at a time.
  6. Compare before/after numbers and preserve behavior with tests where possible.

Common Checks

  • Accidental N+1 queries or missing indexes.
  • Repeated parsing, serialization, regex, or filesystem work.
  • Unbounded loops, deep copies, or needless allocations.
  • Chatty network calls or waterfall loading.
  • Large client bundles, hydration cost, and expensive renders.
  • Cache invalidation that is too broad or too sticky.

Output

Include:

  • Baseline command and result.
  • Hypotheses considered.
  • Changes made or recommended.
  • After result.
  • Tradeoffs and remaining bottlenecks.

If measurement is blocked, state the missing fixture, traffic shape, or profiler access instead of guessing.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.