review-changes
Skill3 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when reviewing a diff, PR, or a batch of changed files and you need to know where the risk concentrates — which changed units have the largest blast radius, whether the highest-risk ones are actually covered by tests, and whether the result is safe to merge. Trigger phrases: "review these changes", "how risky is this diff", "what's the blast radius", "did anything untested change", "rank these changes by risk". Not for a pass/fail preflight of style, security, and layering checks — that is `code-review-checklist`; run the checklist for the mechanical gates and reach for this skill to decide where its attention should concentrate. The two compose: checklist for gates, this skill for prioritization.
34 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- lklimek/claudiustheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- salasebas/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pumpkit-io/sdlctheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- alexandrecsp/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use fix-bug, write-tests and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JetBrainsSkillfix-bug
End-to-end bug fix workflow for the Exposed project. Accepts a GitHub issue (#NUMBER), YouTrack issue (EXPOSED-NUMBER), or YouTrack URL (https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/EXPOSED-NUMBER). Fetches the issue, creates a failing reproducer test, commits on a new branch, implements the fix, validates, and opens a PR. Use this skill whenever the user wants to fix a bug from an issue tracker, mentions a EXPOSED issue number, or references a GitHub issue to fix.
Also in 3 projects that use this
SentrySkillwrite-tests
Write tests following project conventions. Use when adding new tests or modifying existing ones.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GitHubSkillrefactor
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-tickets
Break a plan, spec, or the current conversation into a set of tracer-bullet tickets, each declaring its blocking edges, published to the configured tracker — edges as text in one file per ticket locally, or native blocking links on a real tracker.
Also in 3 projects that use this
GoogleSkillto-spec
Turn the current conversation into a spec and publish it to the project issue tracker — no interview, just synthesis of what you've already discussed.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillwriting-for-agents
Writing documents for agents. Use when creating or editing skills, or modifying AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from google
Other versions34 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 34
- tirth8205/code-review-graph★ 33ksame name
- docker/docs★ 4.7ksame name
- Doist/todoist-ai★ 563same name
- Doist/todoist-cli★ 331same name
- blockscout/frontend★ 310same name
- timothywarner-org/claude-code★ 223same name
- appclawhq/AppClaw★ 111same name
- munvard/dockterm★ 48same name
- uniffy-io/uniffy★ 26same name
- jjxmonster/skills★ 8same name
24 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .ai-badger/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .ai-badger/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .ai-badger/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- ai-raccoon-memorySkill
- archifySkill
- artifact-verificationSkill
- auto-wmSkill
- browser-usageSkill
- call-behavioristSkill
- code-review-checklistSkill
- code-review-evidenceSkill
- commit-reminderSkill
- complete-project-scope-code-reviewSkill
- create-task-specSkill
- debug-issueSkill
- den-refreshSkill
- design-gate-auditSkill
- design-testsSkill
- differential-feature-refactorSkill
- documentation-drift-auditSkill
- documentationSkill
- evidence-first-researchSkill
- explore-codebaseSkill
- feed-badgerSkill
- git-workSkill
- humanizerSkill
- maintain-agent-instructionsSkill
- mcp-indexSkill
- multi-agent-communicationSkill
- multi-lane-report-assemblySkill
- owner-gate-reviewSkill
- pre-push-gate-debuggingSkill
- prompt-markersSkill
- qaSkill
- quick-taskSkill
- refactor-safelySkill
- research-record-auditSkill
- review-gate-diff-verificationSkill
- review-testsSkill
- scripts-tooling-refactorSkill
- semantica-knowledge-graphSkill
- send-messageSkill
- spec-driven-refactoringSkill
- status-reportSkill
- task-decompositionSkill
- taskSkill
- test-economySkill
- welcome-ai-badgerSkill
- worktree-agent-isolationSkill
The file
Files
This is the generic copy. If this project has been scaffolded, prefer the unprefixed
review-changesskill: it is.ai-badger/skills/review-changes/SKILL.md, and it has this project's extensions and anyproject-local.mdmerged in. This copy has neither.The full procedure is in
SKILL.full.mdbeside this file, unchanged — read it if the project has no.ai-badger/, or runwelcome-ai-badgerto scaffold one.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

