design-review-suite
Skill8 starsChanged 3 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
Review, measure, and fix a user interface against published criteria, so every finding cites a rule instead of an opinion. Use for "review my UI", "design review", "critique this screen", "check accessibility", "audit this design", "something looks off", "pre-launch review", "fix the typography", "font pairing", "add a micro-interaction", "pick a colour palette". Five modes. CRITIQUE scores usability heuristics. AUDIT measures code and rendered values into a findings table. POLISH runs the last fix pass over spacing, type, state, and motion. BUILD-CHECK gates a build against a fifteen line checklist by command. DESIGN-SYSTEM picks styles, palettes, and font pairings for new work. Every finding carries a WCAG 2.2 or Nielsen criterion, or is labelled TASTE and ranked below. Do not use for writing product copy, backend or API review, general code review, brand identity, or logo design.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- code-quality-suiteSkill
- decision-supportSkill
- decoderSkill
- pg-startup-evalSkill
- prompt-generatorSkill
- teachSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.