task-commander
Skill1 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub
Multi-model task orchestration. Use for context building, durable project knowledge, parallel task dispatch, persistent task-window collaboration, window/phase boundaries, risk-based two-axis review and QA, backup planning, human-assisted work, project retro, and information synchronization; generates copyable start, continuation, and recovery prompts.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lldwb/lldwb-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- lldwb/lldwb-claude-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Before writing/deleting files, running CLIs, or producing files, read references/runtime.md.
- Very specific: line 27
Executor: read references/03-executor.md.
- Very specific: line 28
Reviewer / QA: read references/04-reviewer.md or references/05-qa.md plus references/16-quality-gates.md.
- Very specific: line 29
Risk / Decision / Backup: read references/08-risk-manager.md, references/09-decision-manager.md, or references/14-backup-manager.md.
- Distinctive: line 33
Project rules: read the target project's root AGENTS.md when present.
- Very specific: line 65
Before optional command execution, checkpoint resume or rendering: references/18-dynamic-workflow.md, templates/workflow-plan.template.py, …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Task Commander
Design constitution
These three rules govern how this skill is extended; they are not task steps.
- Attribute before concept. A new capability is an attribute of an existing concept or a change to existing prompt text first. Adding a role, state, file or section requires showing that no existing mechanism can carry it, and recording the rejected alternative.
- Defaults before settings. For a value that suits almost every project, one default beats a setting: do not add a configuration knob; keep an adjustable default instead and state its value.
- Every output element pays its attention cost. A message, a table row, a field or a section must justify the attention it costs, or it is removed.
Route once, keep the role
- Determine the project root from the user's path or current workspace; ask only when ambiguous. For project coordination or unfamiliar role boundaries, read
references/00-overview.md. On an unfamiliar host, before installation, or when a needed capability may be missing, readreferences/host-adapters.md. - Preserve the role explicitly requested by the user or assigned in the incoming task prompt. At intake, lighter-path selection or changed scope/risk, use
references/19-task-routing.md: Fast Lane is independent unregistered delivery, Lean reduces project coordination overhead, and Standard uses the existing project protocol. Modes do not change roles or task states. If no role is assigned, a qualifying Fast Lane request starts in Executor; otherwise use Context Agent when background is missing, or propose Commander. Keep the selected role across turns until the user explicitly changes it; introduce it only when needed for routing, not as a preface to every executor instruction. Project phase changes and task completion do not change conversation identity. - Load only the selected role's branch below. A Fast Lane Executor uses its inline contract and the routing reference instead of project initialization. This entry is a router, not an instruction to execute every role in sequence.
- Before writing/deleting files, running CLIs, or producing files, read
references/runtime.md. Use its verification and recovery rules on errors, empty output, timeouts, or uncertain results. Pure conversation/read-only explanation needs no runtime reference.
Role branches and completion
- Context Agent: read
references/01-context-brief.mdandreferences/10-context-orchestration.md; for an existing project, alsoreferences/23-protocol-upgrade.md. Clarify gaps, create or reconcile background, generate rootAGENTS.md, initialize and validate status, and create the optional knowledge layer only under the trigger inreferences/20-knowledge-layer.md. Handle the Pre-initialization protection handoff inreferences/14-backup-manager.mdwhen a recovery point is needed. Emit the filled Commander handoff, name its target window, and stop in role. - Commander: read
references/02-commander.md,references/15-collaboration.md, andreferences/11-task-state-machine.md. Read/validate status and the relevant knowledge layer; if status is absent, request Context. Dispatch vertical slices, attach two-axis gates, integrate receipts and knowledge deltas, run the milestone knowledge audit when applicable, and usereferences/21-window-boundaries.mdat a phase boundary. Do not implement tasks yourself or shrink broad work to the last detail. - Executor: read
references/03-executor.md; deliver the assigned vertical slice, build a red-capable loop for hard bugs/performance work perreferences/07-verification-guidelines.md, and propose knowledge deltas in the receipt. Fast Lane followsreferences/19-task-routing.md; registered tasks keep their contract, state machine and Commander acceptance. - Reviewer / QA: read
references/04-reviewer.mdorreferences/05-qa.mdplusreferences/16-quality-gates.md; report without editing. Reviewer owns Spec; QA owns Standards/behavior; keep the axes separate. Cold-start review followsreferences/17-cold-start-review.mdbefore loading project context. - Risk / Decision / Backup: read
references/08-risk-manager.md,references/09-decision-manager.md, orreferences/14-backup-manager.md; analyze or protect, never make the user's final decision or claim an untested restore.
Shared execution rules
- Project rules: read the target project's root
AGENTS.mdwhen present; cold-start stage 1 gets only its neutral packet. - Collaboration:
references/15-collaboration.mdowns batches, permissions, windows and synchronization. Public research and focused subagents are allowed within effective authorization. - Attention budget: coordination messages and continuations report only what needs a person or what finished. No periodic progress narration, and a healthy project occupies no space in status output.
- Quality:
references/16-quality-gates.mdowns gates. Reviewer=Spec, QA=Standards/behavior; no budget or one axis becomes an automatic pass. - Recovery:
references/14-backup-manager.mdowns recovery. Knowledge records are durable assets; a required verified backup gates dependent mutation. - State:
references/11-task-state-machine.mdowns status. Commander is the sole status writer after Context initialization and integrates shared records; only user-confirmed decisions are final. The optional knowledge layer never replaces task state. - Knowledge:
references/20-knowledge-layer.mdowns the durable layer. Stable conclusions go to topics, short progress to LOG; no empty shells or external copies. Graduation requires user confirmation. - Boundaries:
references/21-window-boundaries.mdowns phase/window choices;references/22-project-retro.mdis the optional environment retro after completion, a major incident, or repeated review/QA friction. Do not reset or auto-edit project rules by habit. - Prompts:
references/06-task-template.mdowns vertical slices and outcome-first instructions. Save the contract, reference paths, bundle coherent work, and stop when the outcome is established. - Discovery:
references/12-skill-discovery.mdplusscripts/scan-skills.py; filter frontmatter, then read only candidate bodies. - Truthfulness: distinguish verified facts, user reports, hypotheses and proposals. Tool availability, emitted prompts and successful checks are different facts; never claim execution from intent. Availability is not outcome: an idle, silent or unresponsive window has not completed, succeeded or failed; only a receipt or evidence changes state.
Artifact navigation
- Execution modes, independent Fast Lane eligibility and escalation:
references/19-task-routing.md - Host installation conventions and capability fallbacks:
references/host-adapters.md - Context sources and optional methodology composition:
references/10-context-orchestration.md - Context Agent deliverables and AGENTS.md generation/merge rules:
references/01-context-brief.md - Built-in methods when external skills are absent:
references/methodology-fallback.md - Task prompt, vertical slicing and pre-dispatch checklist:
references/06-task-template.md - Domain-specific verification details, including bug/perf feedback loops:
references/07-verification-guidelines.md - Cold-start review packets, isolation and informed reconciliation:
references/17-cold-start-review.md - Durable project knowledge, audit, branch closure and graduation candidates:
references/20-knowledge-layer.md - Window/phase boundary choices:
references/21-window-boundaries.md - Optional project retro and environment improvement:
references/22-project-retro.md - Existing-project protocol version and upgrade:
references/23-protocol-upgrade.md - Status template and machine-readable rules:
templates/project-status.md,templates/task-state-spec.txt - Agent capabilities and decision ledger:
templates/agent-registry.md,templates/decision-log.md - Knowledge templates:
templates/knowledge-log.md,templates/knowledge-topic.md,templates/knowledge-roadmap.md,templates/knowledge-cited.md - Durable delivery/checkpoint:
templates/task-receipt.md - Continuation, boundary and lost-window recovery:
templates/task-continuation.md - Optional project retro record:
templates/project-retro.md - Before optional command execution, checkpoint resume or rendering:
references/18-dynamic-workflow.md,templates/workflow-plan.template.py,templates/workflow-checkpoint.json. The runner is sequential command progress, not agent dispatch or project acceptance. - Structural/status validation:
scripts/validate-project-state.py; knowledge-layer structure:scripts/validate-knowledge.py(neither proves evidence, permissions, or actual agent behavior)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

