template-release
Skill4 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Cut a new template version — bump TEMPLATE_VERSION, write upgrade notes, tag and publish a GitHub release. Use when releasing a new version of the agentic-mobile-blueprint template.
- Commits and pushes
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- apple-appstore-setupSkill
- eas-mobile-deploymentSkill
- edge-functionsSkill
- frontend-developmentSkill
- google-play-setupSkill
- langfuse-tracingSkill
- mobile-developmentSkill
- posthog-analyticsSkill
- push-notificationsSkill
- revenuecatSkill
- sentry-integrationSkill
- social-auth-setupSkill
- stripe-paymentsSkill
- supabase-email-templatesSkill
- template-upgradeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Very specific: line 21
Read TEMPLATE_VERSION to get the current version.
- Very specific: line 31
Create .agents/skills/template-upgrade/vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.md using the template below.
- Distinctive: line 32
Every section is required.
- Distinctive: line 36
Only document changes that consuming projects can and should pull in:
- Distinctive: line 48
Rule of thumb: if a project that forked this template has almost certainly replaced the file already, do not mention it.
- Very specific: line 98
Update the TEMPLATE_VERSION file (single line, no v prefix):
- Distinctive: line 130
Never force-push a tag: Create a new patch release instead.
- Distinctive: line 131
One release per PR: Do not bundle multiple feature sets into a single release if they serve different purposes — prefer smaller, focused …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release Process
This template uses semver (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH) for tracking purposes only.
CI/CD pipelines are not gated on version tags — they trigger on merges to main.
| Bump | When |
| PATCH (0.1.x) | Bug fixes, security patches, dependency updates — no API or skill changes |
| MINOR (0.x.0) | New features, new skills, new integrations — backwards-compatible |
| MAJOR (x.0.0) | Breaking changes to file structure, API contracts, or required env vars |
Step 1 — Decide the next version
- Read
TEMPLATE_VERSIONto get the current version. - Review changes since the last tag:
git log $(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)..HEAD --oneline git diff $(git describe --tags --abbrev=0)..HEAD --stat - Apply the semver rules above to pick
MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.
Step 2 — Write upgrade notes
Create .agents/skills/template-upgrade/vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.md using the template below.
Every section is required. Use "None" for empty sections — never omit them.
What belongs in upgrade notes
Only document changes that consuming projects can and should pull in:
| Include | Exclude |
supabase/functions/_shared/ utilities | mobile/app/ screens and components |
.agents/skills/ (new or updated skills) | maestro/ YAML test flows |
supabase/migrations/ shared schema | Example / demo screens |
Build config (eas.json, app.json keys) | Any file a project is expected to replace |
| New required env vars | Internal refactors with no consumer impact |
| Dependency version bumps | |
AGENTS.md changes agents should adopt |
Rule of thumb: if a project that forked this template has almost certainly replaced the file already, do not mention it.
# vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH — <one-line summary>
Released: YYYY-MM-DD
## Breaking Changes
<!-- What existing projects MUST change before upgrading. -->
<!-- Format: "**`path/to/file`** — what changed and why" -->
None
## New Features
<!-- New shared skills, utilities, or integrations. -->
<!-- Do NOT include app-scaffold additions (screens, demo flows, etc.). -->
None
## Improvements
<!-- Reliability, performance, or DX improvements to shared infrastructure. -->
None
## Bug Fixes
<!-- Defects corrected in shared code. -->
None
## Dependency Updates
<!-- Package version bumps worth noting. -->
None
## Upgrade Instructions
Step-by-step for a project that already uses a previous version of this template.
1. Copy changed shared files / snippets as described in each section above.
2. Update any env vars listed under Breaking Changes.
3. Run `mise run configure` if new env vars were added.Step 3 — Bump TEMPLATE_VERSION
Update the TEMPLATE_VERSION file (single line, no v prefix):
echo "MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH" > TEMPLATE_VERSIONStep 4 — Commit and tag
Stage everything, commit, then create an annotated tag:
git add TEMPLATE_VERSION .agents/skills/template-upgrade/vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.md
git add -A # any other changed files in the release
git commit -m "release: vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH"
git tag -a vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH -m "vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH — <one-line summary>"
git push origin main --follow-tagsStep 5 — Publish GitHub release
gh release create vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH \
--title "vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH — <one-line summary>" \
--notes-file .agents/skills/template-upgrade/vMAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.mdRules
- Never skip the upgrade notes. Projects forking this template rely on them to know what to pull in.
- Upgrade notes cover shared infrastructure only. App scaffold files (
mobile/app/, example screens, demo Maestro flows) are replaced by consuming projects — never mention them in upgrade notes. - Never force-push a tag. Create a new patch release instead.
- One release per PR. Do not bundle multiple feature sets into a single release if they serve different purposes — prefer smaller, focused releases.
- The
TEMPLATE_VERSIONfile is the single source of truth. Do not derive the version frompackage.jsonor any other file.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

