agentleFS
AkshitIreddyAkshitIreddy/agent-skills/skills/try-it-first/SKILL.md

try-it-first

Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use a quick experiment or rendered prototype to resolve uncertain behavior or compare design alternatives.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Run the smallest safe experiment that answers the actual question.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Keep the setup proportional to the question.

    line 36

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Try it and inspect the result

Run the smallest safe experiment that answers the actual question. Use existing harnesses and real project inputs where practical. A scratch probe is enough when a permanent test would add no value.

Choose an observable outcome: actual API shape, elapsed time, persisted state, rendered appearance, or a reproducible failure. Inspect surprising results for harness mistakes before building on them. Distinguish observation from its explanation, then test the proposed cause.

Compare a design direction

For an aesthetic choice, produce a few meaningful alternatives and compare them at the intended scale. Keep presentation comparable. Judge subject fit, hierarchy, legibility, and the desired experience. A fixed variant count or number of rounds is unnecessary.

Research an unfamiliar technique when it would change the experiment; a reversible prototype can proceed alongside research. A specimen board supports a design decision. Integrate the chosen result into the actual product before claiming the requested implementation is complete.

Respect the evidence boundary

A still cannot establish smooth motion, and offline sound metrics cannot establish live playback or pleasantness. For temporal defects, exercise normal, rapid, and interrupted paths and inspect state ordering. A non-reproduction does not invalidate a user's repeatable observation.

Keep the setup proportional to the question. Think through costly or hard-to-reverse actions before executing them. Stop experimenting when the decision is supported and continue the requested implementation or verification. Report what ran, what was observed, and any unresolved limitation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.