handoff
Skill1 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub
End-of-session command ("Handoff" instead of "commit"): put notes into the tasks, commit what is not work in progress, record open user questions as drafts and leave only a pointer in docs/agent/HANDOFF.md, or write no handoff when nothing is open. Use when ending a session, at a task or milestone boundary, when a context notice reports a large context (threshold in `R-BATCHING`), or before switching agents.
- Commits and pushes
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xiaoxiaosrm/dsh-mattpocock-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ethosagent/ethostheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- glebis/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/agent-configtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- domengabrovsek/claudetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use decision-mapping, setup-ts-deep-modules and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 8 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 42 projects that use this
AWSSkillto-questionnaire
Turn a decision you can't fully answer into a questionnaire for someone else to fill in.
Also in 93 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 87 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 51 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 54 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- ykdojo/claude-code-tips★ 10ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- alignmentSkill
- market-analysisSkill
- port-checkSkill
- promote-learningSkill
- retroSkill
- stem-updateSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 19
Nothing open → write no handoff: Delete an existing docs/agent/HANDOFF.md, commit that, go to step 5.
- Distinctive: line 33
Commit the handoff last (a later commit marks it consumed).
- Very specific: line 40
If a step did not fit or you deviated from it: Learning: skill handoff: <what> -> <change> in the task notes (R-LEARNING).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Handoff / session end
Rules: R-STATE, R-BOOTSTRAP, R-STATE-COHERENCE. The handoff holds only what git and the backlog cannot tell the next session: what waits for the user. Branch, commits, active and ready tasks, RETRO DUE and versions come from the session-start script and never go into it.
1. Notes into the tasks
Each unfinished task gets a concrete continuation point in its notes (open criterion, next action as Next:), hard-won context (ruled-out hypotheses), evidence with the SHA it verified (R-STATE-COHERENCE), and Learning: only if a detour happened (R-LEARNING).
2. Commit what is not work in progress
Explicit paths, code together with its task changes (R-STATE-COHERENCE). Half-finished work stays out of main: a task note, or a WIP branch. Task work keeps TASK-<n>: <summary>; a commit of only notes, drafts or the handoff is titled Handoff <YYYY-MM-DD>: <content> (the commit-msg hook accepts it).
3. Check
git status --porcelain clean (WIP named), no open user question or approval from this session. Unpushed commits are not open: they are in git; step 5 pushes them.
- Something open → step 4.
- Nothing open → write no handoff. Delete an existing
docs/agent/HANDOFF.md, commit that, go to step 5. (Session start hides a handoff once a later commit exists, but the file stays until deleted.)
4. Open question: draft plus pointer
Record each open question or decision in a draft task with the options verbatim; it carries no overhead (no DoD, label, milestone or acceptance criteria):
backlog task create "Decide: <topic>" --draft --no-dod-defaults -d "Question to the user (<date>): <question>. Options: a) ... (recommended) b) ... c) ..."The description must start with Question to the user: session start lists such drafts under "open questions". A question asked in chat is recorded the same way at once, not only at session end.
Then rewrite docs/agent/HANDOFF.md from scratch (max 1 KB, drop empty lines):
# Handoff
**Open for the user:** <DRAFT-n: one-line question>; <pending approval, e.g. a release>
**After the answer:** <one concrete action, with file or command>Commit the handoff last (a later commit marks it consumed). The session that settles the question deletes the handoff, and the draft (or promotes it to a task), in the same commit.
5. Push, then start the fresh session
Push (git push, normal fast-forward only) finished commits automatically, without asking. Skip the push silently, and propose it with the reason in the final message, if you judge the unpushed commits may be unwanted (WIP, experimental, unreviewed, sensitive content, a branch the user did not intend to publish). Never force push; tags and releases stay a separate decision. Never put the push into the handoff file.
Start the fresh session per R-BATCHING "A handoff always opens a fresh session": start_session with context fresh, then detach_session on it; the brief says not to report back, then continues the approved batch or unfinished task (per docs/agent/HANDOFF.md / task notes), or tells the new session to run session start and propose the next steps. Do not mention the handoff or ask to read it: session start loads it automatically. Then end with one line (handed off to <link>, open: ...) and stop. If no tool can start a session, end with one ready-to-paste prompt instead.
If a step did not fit or you deviated from it: Learning: skill handoff: <what> -> <change> in the task notes (R-LEARNING).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

