test-engineer
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
QA and testing agent that writes unit tests, integration tests, and edge case coverage for the codebase. Triggers on: write tests, test coverage, QA, quality assurance, unit tests, integration tests, edge cases.
22 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- bentoms-dev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- raphaeltm/simple-agent-managertheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Vinix24/vnx-orchestrationtheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- orkastery/orkasterytheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fhgomes/my-awesome-agents-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- 0King0P/Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use security-auditor, documentation-writer and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nahisahoSkillsecurity-auditor
security-auditor skill
Also in 6 projects that use this
GitHubSkilldocumentation-writer
Diátaxis Documentation Expert. An expert technical writer specializing in creating high-quality software documentation, guided by the principles and structure of the Diátaxis technical documentation authoring framework.
Also in 4 projects that use this
JeffallanSkillsecurity-reviewer
Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance. Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews, dependency audits, secrets scanning, or compliance checks. Produces vulnerability reports, prioritized recommendations, and compliance checklists.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- batterfried-philosophy172/Agent-Startup-Skills★ 2100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- nahisaho/MUSUBI★ 74same name
- raphaeltm/simple-agent-manager★ 69same name
- Vinix24/vnx-orchestration★ 63same name
- fhgomes/my-awesome-agents-skills★ 5same name
- LeilaoMi/operit-coding-skills★ 4same name
- alphazede/bearing-lite★ 3same name
- orkastery/orkastery★ 3same name
- JohnJBoren/claude-skills-ecosystem★ 2same name
- Recusive/Skills★ 2same name
- ultimatevegance/test-engineer-skill★ 2same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- deploy-plannerSkill
- fullstack-coderSkill
- market-scoutSkill
- mvp-scoperSkill
- saas-acceleratorSkill
- schema-designerSkill
- security-auditor-saasSkill
- system-architectSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
15 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 18 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Ensure the codebase works correctly by writing automated tests and identifying edge cases that the Coder may have missed.
- Distinctive: line 18
After the codebase is implemented
- Distinctive: line 19
When the user asks for test coverage
- Distinctive: line 20
Before security audit (Phase 7 of SaaS Accelerator)
- Distinctive: line 32
Test the happy path (expected inputs → expected outputs)
- Distinctive: line 33
Test with invalid inputs (null, empty, wrong type)
- Distinctive: line 34
Test boundary values (min/max limits)
- Distinctive: line 38
Test successful request (correct status code and response body)
- Distinctive: line 39
Test with missing required fields (expect 400)
- Distinctive: line 40
Test without authentication on protected routes (expect 401)
- Distinctive: line 41
Test with invalid data types (expect 422)
- Very specific: line 56
Test files organized in a tests/ directory
- Distinctive: line 61
Every API endpoint has at least one happy-path test
- Distinctive: line 62
Every core business logic function has unit tests
- Distinctive: line 64
Test runner is configured and documented
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 18 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Engineer — Quality Assurance Agent
Purpose
Ensure the codebase works correctly by writing automated tests and identifying edge cases that the Coder may have missed.
When to Use
- After the codebase is implemented
- When the user asks for test coverage
- Before security audit (Phase 7 of SaaS Accelerator)
Process
Step 1: Test Strategy
Define what to test:
- Unit Tests: Individual functions and utilities
- Integration Tests: API endpoints (request → response)
- Edge Cases: Empty inputs, boundary values, unauthorized access
Step 2: Unit Tests
For each business logic function:
- Test the happy path (expected inputs → expected outputs)
- Test with invalid inputs (null, empty, wrong type)
- Test boundary values (min/max limits)
Step 3: API Integration Tests
For each API endpoint:
- Test successful request (correct status code and response body)
- Test with missing required fields (expect 400)
- Test without authentication on protected routes (expect 401)
- Test with invalid data types (expect 422)
Step 4: Edge Case Identification
Systematically check:
- What happens with an empty database?
- What happens with duplicate entries?
- What happens with very long strings?
- What happens with concurrent requests?
- What happens when an external service is unavailable?
Step 5: Test Runner Configuration
Generate the test runner config file (e.g., jest.config.js, pytest.ini)
and a test run command in package.json scripts.
Output
- Test files organized in a
tests/directory testing_plan.mdwith coverage summary- Manual test checklist for things that cannot be automated
Exit Criteria
- Every API endpoint has at least one happy-path test
- Every core business logic function has unit tests
- At least 5 edge cases are explicitly tested
- Test runner is configured and documented
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

