agentleFS
AgentWorkforceAgentWorkforce/relay/.claude/skills/debugging-websocket-issues/SKILL.md

debugging-websocket-issues

Skill1.1k starsChanged 51 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when seeing WebSocket errors like "Invalid frame header", "RSV1 must be clear", or "WS_ERR_UNEXPECTED_RSV_1" - covers multiple WebSocketServer conflicts, compression issues, and raw frame debugging techniques

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about AgentWorkforce/relay

The biggest 5 of 21 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 21

Talked about on GitHub and Hacker News (21 times).

On GitHub · 20

15 more on GitHub

On Hacker News · 1

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    When attaching multiple WebSocketServer instances to the same HTTP server using the server option:

    line 34
  2. Very specific:

    Use noServer: true and manually route upgrades:

    line 54

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Debugging WebSocket Issues

Overview

WebSocket "invalid frame header" errors often stem from raw HTTP being written to an upgraded socket, not actual frame corruption. The most common cause is multiple WebSocketServer instances conflicting on the same HTTP server.

When to Use

  • Error: Invalid WebSocket frame: RSV1 must be clear
  • Error: WS_ERR_UNEXPECTED_RSV_1
  • Error: Invalid frame header
  • WebSocket connects then immediately disconnects with code 1006
  • Server logs success but client receives garbage data

Quick Reference

SymptomLikely CauseFix
RSV1 must be clearMultiple WSS on same server OR compression mismatchUse noServer: true mode
Hex starts with 48545450Raw HTTP on WebSocket (0x48='H')Check for conflicting upgrade handlers
Code 1006, no reasonAbnormal closure, often server-side abortCheck abortHandshake calls
Works isolated, fails in appSomething else writing to socketAudit all upgrade listeners

The Multiple WebSocketServer Bug

Problem

When attaching multiple WebSocketServer instances to the same HTTP server using the server option:

// ❌ BAD - Both servers add upgrade listeners, causing conflicts
const wss1 = new WebSocketServer({ server, path: '/ws' });
const wss2 = new WebSocketServer({ server, path: '/ws/other' });

What happens:

  1. Client connects to /ws
  2. BOTH upgrade handlers fire (Node.js EventEmitter calls all listeners)
  3. wss1 matches path, handles upgrade successfully
  4. wss2 doesn't match, calls abortHandshake(socket, 400)
  5. Raw HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request written to the now-WebSocket socket
  6. Client receives HTTP text as WebSocket frame data
  7. First byte 0x48 ('H') interpreted as: RSV1=1, opcode=8 → invalid frame

Solution

Use noServer: true and manually route upgrades:

// ✅ GOOD - Single upgrade handler routes to correct server
const wss1 = new WebSocketServer({ noServer: true, perMessageDeflate: false });
const wss2 = new WebSocketServer({ noServer: true, perMessageDeflate: false });

server.on('upgrade', (request, socket, head) => {
  const pathname = new URL(request.url || '', `http://${request.headers.host}`).pathname;

  if (pathname === '/ws') {
    wss1.handleUpgrade(request, socket, head, (ws) => {
      wss1.emit('connection', ws, request);
    });
  } else if (pathname === '/ws/other') {
    wss2.handleUpgrade(request, socket, head, (ws) => {
      wss2.emit('connection', ws, request);
    });
  } else {
    socket.destroy();
  }
});

Debugging Techniques

Raw Frame Inspection

Hook into the socket to see actual bytes received:

ws.on('open', () => {
  const socket = ws._socket;
  const originalPush = socket.push.bind(socket);

  socket.push = function (chunk, encoding) {
    if (chunk) {
      console.log('First 20 bytes (hex):', chunk.slice(0, 20).toString('hex'));
      const byte0 = chunk[0];
      console.log(`FIN: ${!!(byte0 & 0x80)}, RSV1: ${!!(byte0 & 0x40)}, Opcode: ${byte0 & 0x0f}`);

      // Check if it's actually HTTP text
      if (chunk.slice(0, 4).toString() === 'HTTP') {
        console.log('*** RECEIVED RAW HTTP ON WEBSOCKET ***');
      }
    }
    return originalPush(chunk, encoding);
  };
});

Key Hex Patterns

  • 81 = FIN + text frame (normal)
  • 82 = FIN + binary frame (normal)
  • 88 = FIN + close frame (normal)
  • 48545450 = "HTTP" - raw HTTP on WebSocket (bug!)
  • c1 or similar with bit 6 set = compressed frame (RSV1=1)

Common Mistakes

MistakeResultFix
Multiple WSS with server optionHTTP 400 written to socketUse noServer: true
perMessageDeflate: true (default in older ws)RSV1 set on framesExplicitly set perMessageDeflate: false
Not checking upgrade headersMiss compression negotiationLog sec-websocket-extensions header
Assuming RSV1 error = compressionCould be raw HTTPCheck if bytes decode as ASCII "HTTP"

Verification Checklist

After fixing, verify:

  • RSV1: false in frame inspection
  • Extensions header: NONE in upgrade response
  • No HTTP/1.1 in raw frame data
  • Messages received match sent payload size
  • Multiple broadcasts work (test interval sends)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.