content-pillar-atomizer
Skill757 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Take 1 blog post or article and generate 15-30 platform-native micro-content pieces. Not reformatting — re-contextualizing for each platform's culture. Triggers on: "atomize this content", "repurpose my blog post", "turn this into social posts", "content atomizer", "pillar content", "one to many content", "repurpose content", "multiply my content", "content explosion", "turn article into posts", "break down this article", "micro content from blog", "content pillar strategy", "10x my content", "platform-native content", "atomize", "content multiplication".
In this repository55 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- affiliate-checkSkill
- ab-test-generatorSkill
- conversion-trackerSkill
- internal-linking-optimizerSkill
- performance-reportSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- content-repurposerSkill
- email-automation-builderSkill
- multi-program-managerSkill
- paid-ad-copy-writerSkill
- proprietary-data-generatorSkill
- affiliate-blog-builderSkill
- comparison-post-writerSkill
- content-decay-detectorSkill
- content-moat-calculatorSkill
- how-to-tutorial-writerSkill
- keyword-cluster-architectSkill
- listicle-generatorSkill
- content-research-briefSkill
- infographic-generatorSkill
- reddit-post-writerSkill
- tiktok-script-writerSkill
- twitter-thread-writerSkill
- viral-post-writerSkill
- bio-link-deployerSkill
- email-drip-sequenceSkill
- github-pages-deployerSkill
- social-media-schedulerSkill
- bonus-stack-builderSkill
- grand-slam-offerSkill
- guarantee-generatorSkill
- landing-page-creatorSkill
- product-showcase-pageSkill
- squeeze-page-builderSkill
- value-ladder-architectSkill
- webinar-registration-pageSkill
- category-designerSkill
- compliance-checkerSkill
- create-skillSkill
- funnel-plannerSkill
- self-improverSkill
- skill-finderSkill
- affiliate-program-searchSkill
- commission-calculatorSkill
- competitor-spySkill
- content-angle-rankerSkill
- find-and-verify-affiliate-programSkill
- monopoly-niche-finderSkill
- niche-opportunity-finderSkill
- purple-cow-auditSkill
- submit-programSkill
- traffic-analyzerSkill
- trending-content-scoutSkill
- your-skill-nameSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 34
After affiliate-blog-builder (S3) produces an article — atomize it into social
- Very specific: line 58
Chaining from S3: If affiliate-blog-builder was run, use its output article as pillar_content.
- Very specific: line 60
Chaining from S1 monopoly-niche-finder: Use monopoly_niche positioning to angle all micro-content.
- Very specific: line 66
If URL provided, use web_fetch to retrieve content
- Distinctive: line 73
Before atomizing equally across all platforms, understand which platforms are hot for this topic:
- Very specific: line 76
Use platform-level engagement data from pattern_analysis
- Very specific: line 77
Check engagement_benchmark.platform_averages — which platform has highest engagement for this keyword?
- Distinctive: line 83
Check: is this topic more visual (→ TikTok/YouTube heavy) or professional (→ LinkedIn heavy)?
- Distinctive: line 84
Look for: which platform shows up most in search results for this topic?
- Distinctive: line 87
Default: equal split across platforms
- Distinctive: line 89
If TikTok engagement is 5x LinkedIn for this topic → generate 5 TikTok scripts, 1 LinkedIn post
- Distinctive: line 90
If Reddit has high engagement → don't skip Reddit (often ignored by affiliates = opportunity)
- Distinctive: line 91
If YouTube dominates → consider atomizing into YouTube Shorts scripts instead of just TikTok
- Very specific: line 102
Read shared/references/platform-rules.md for platform-specific rules.
- Distinctive: line 257
Add your affiliate link in bio or first comment
- Distinctive: line 261
After 7 days, check: which platform generated the most affiliate link clicks?
- Distinctive: line 285
Before delivering output, verify:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Pillar Atomizer
Take 1 blog post or article and generate 15-30 platform-native micro-content pieces. This is NOT reformatting — it's re-contextualizing each piece for the platform's culture, format, and audience expectations. A LinkedIn post reads nothing like a Reddit comment, even if they carry the same insight.
Stage
S2: Content Creation — This IS content creation, just at 10x scale. One piece of deep work becomes a month of social content.
When to Use
- User has a blog post, article, or long-form content and wants to maximize its reach
- User asks to "repurpose" or "atomize" content
- User says "turn this into social posts", "content multiplication", "pillar content"
- After
affiliate-blog-builder(S3) produces an article — atomize it into social - User wants to maintain consistent content output without creating from scratch daily
Input Schema
pillar_content: string # REQUIRED — the full blog post/article text, or URL to fetch
platforms: string[] # OPTIONAL — target platforms
# Options: "twitter", "linkedin", "reddit", "tiktok", "email", "threads"
# Default: ["twitter", "linkedin", "reddit"]
product: object # OPTIONAL — affiliate product being promoted
name: string
url: string
reward_value: string
mode: string # OPTIONAL — "quality" | "volume"
# Default: "quality"
tone: string # OPTIONAL — "professional" | "casual" | "edgy" | "educational"
# Default: inferred from pillar contentChaining from S3: If affiliate-blog-builder was run, use its output article as pillar_content.
Chaining from S1 monopoly-niche-finder: Use monopoly_niche positioning to angle all micro-content.
Workflow
Step 1: Analyze Pillar Content
- If URL provided, use
web_fetchto retrieve content - Extract: key insights (5-8), data points, quotes, frameworks, stories, opinions
- Identify the "atomic units" — self-contained ideas that work independently
- Note the product/affiliate angle (if present)
Step 1.5: Check Platform Performance for This Topic (data-driven)
Before atomizing equally across all platforms, understand which platforms are hot for this topic:
If trending-content-scout ran:
- Use platform-level engagement data from
pattern_analysis - Check
engagement_benchmark.platform_averages— which platform has highest engagement for this keyword? - Prioritize platforms where this topic has highest engagement
- Adjust platform allocation accordingly (see below)
Quick check (no scout data):
web_search "[topic] youtube vs tiktok vs linkedin"→ which platform dominates discussion?- Check: is this topic more visual (→ TikTok/YouTube heavy) or professional (→ LinkedIn heavy)?
- Look for: which platform shows up most in search results for this topic?
Apply to atomization allocation:
- Default: equal split across platforms
- Data-driven: proportional to engagement potential
- If TikTok engagement is 5x LinkedIn for this topic → generate 5 TikTok scripts, 1 LinkedIn post
- If Reddit has high engagement → don't skip Reddit (often ignored by affiliates = opportunity)
- If YouTube dominates → consider atomizing into YouTube Shorts scripts instead of just TikTok
Platform allocation example:
Default (no data): Twitter: 5 | LinkedIn: 3 | Reddit: 3 | TikTok: 3 | Email: 2
Data-driven (TikTok hot): Twitter: 3 | LinkedIn: 1 | Reddit: 2 | TikTok: 6 | Email: 2
Data-driven (LinkedIn hot): Twitter: 3 | LinkedIn: 5 | Reddit: 2 | TikTok: 2 | Email: 2Step 2: Platform Mapping
Read shared/references/platform-rules.md for platform-specific rules.
For each platform, map the culture:
| Platform | Format | Tone | Length | CTA Style |
| Twitter/X | Thread or single tweet | Punchy, opinionated | 280 chars or 5-10 tweet thread | Last tweet |
| Story or insight post | Professional, first-person | 1300 chars | Soft CTA in comments | |
| Value-first post/comment | Helpful, honest, skeptical-aware | Variable | Disclosure + subtle | |
| TikTok | Script with hook | Casual, energetic | 30-60s script | Verbal + bio link |
| Newsletter section | Conversational | 200-400 words | Direct link | |
| Threads | Conversational take | Casual, authentic | 500 chars | Bio link |
Step 3: Generate Micro-Content
For each platform, generate pieces from different atomic units:
- Twitter: 3-5 pieces (1 thread, 2-3 standalone tweets, 1 hot take)
- LinkedIn: 2-3 pieces (1 story post, 1 insight post, 1 question post)
- Reddit: 2-3 pieces (1 detailed post, 1-2 comment-ready responses)
- TikTok: 2-3 scripts (1 educational, 1 hot take, 1 tutorial)
- Email: 1-2 pieces (newsletter section, dedicated email)
- Threads: 2-3 pieces (conversational takes)
Each piece must:
- Stand alone (makes sense without reading the pillar)
- Feel native to the platform (not a copy-paste resize)
- Carry one clear insight or value point
- Include appropriate FTC disclosure for affiliate content
Step 4: Tag for Tracking
Tag each piece with:
- Source pillar reference
- Platform
- Content type (thread, single, story, script)
- Affiliate product (if applicable)
- Suggested posting time/day
Step 5: Self-Validation
- Each piece feels native to its platform (not copy-pasted)
- Each piece stands alone without needing the pillar
- FTC disclosure included where affiliate links present
- No two pieces on the same platform say the same thing
- Platform rules followed (Reddit skepticism, LinkedIn professionalism, etc.)
Output Schema
output_schema_version: "1.0.0"
atomized_content:
pillar_title: string
total_pieces: number
platforms_covered: string[]
pieces:
- platform: string
type: string # "thread" | "single" | "story" | "script" | "email" | "comment"
content: string # The actual content, ready to post
insight_source: string # Which atomic unit from the pillar
has_affiliate_link: boolean
suggested_timing: string # e.g., "Tuesday 9am"
variant_id: string # For volume mode A/B tracking
content_pillars: string[] # Atomic units extracted (for chaining)
chain_metadata:
skill_slug: "content-pillar-atomizer"
stage: "content"
timestamp: string
suggested_next:
- "social-media-scheduler"
- "email-drip-sequence"
- "ab-test-generator"Output Format
## Content Atomizer: [Pillar Title]
### Pillar Analysis
- **Atomic units extracted:** X insights
- **Platforms:** [list]
- **Total pieces generated:** XX
---
### Twitter/X (X pieces)
**Thread: [Title]**
🧵 1/ [first tweet]
2/ [second tweet]
...
[last tweet with CTA]
**Standalone Tweet:**
[tweet text]
---
### LinkedIn (X pieces)
**Story Post:**
[full LinkedIn post]
---
### Reddit (X pieces)
**Post: r/[subreddit]**
Title: [title]
[body with disclosure]
---
[Continue for each platform]
### Posting Schedule
| Day | Platform | Piece | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mon | Twitter | Thread | 9am |
| Tue | LinkedIn | Story | 8am |
| Wed | Reddit | Post | 12pm |Error Handling
- No pillar content provided: "Paste your blog post or article, or give me the URL and I'll fetch it."
- Content too short: "This is quite short for atomization. I'll extract what I can, but consider writing a longer pillar first with
affiliate-blog-builder." - No affiliate angle: Generate content without affiliate links. Pure value content builds audience for future promotions.
- Platform not supported: "I don't have specific rules for [platform]. I'll format it generically — review before posting."
Examples
Example 1: "Atomize my HeyGen review blog post into social content" → Extract 6 key insights, generate 15 pieces across Twitter (thread + 3 tweets), LinkedIn (2 posts), Reddit (2 posts), TikTok (2 scripts).
Example 2: "Turn this article into LinkedIn and Twitter content" → Focus on 2 platforms only. Generate 3 LinkedIn posts (story, insight, question) and 5 Twitter pieces (thread, 3 tweets, hot take).
Example 3: "Atomize in volume mode" (after affiliate-blog-builder) → Pick up article from chain. Generate 25-30 pieces with multiple variations per platform for A/B testing.
Revenue & Action Plan
Expected Outcomes
- Revenue potential: Each atomized piece is a new touchpoint driving affiliate clicks. 15-30 pieces from 1 article = 15-30x more chances for commission
- Benchmark: Top affiliate content creators report 2-5% of social impressions convert to link clicks. At $50 avg commission, 10,000 impressions across all pieces = $100-250/month from ONE pillar article
- Key metric to track: Bio link / affiliate link CTR per platform — which platform drives the most clicks per impression?
Do This Right Now (15 min)
- Pick the single strongest piece from the output — the one with the most specific, surprising insight
- Post it on your highest-engagement platform immediately
- Add your affiliate link in bio or first comment
- Set a reminder to post the next piece tomorrow
Track Your Results
After 7 days, check: which platform generated the most affiliate link clicks? Double down on that platform, reduce effort on underperformers.
Next step — copy-paste this prompt: "Schedule all my atomized content for the next 30 days" → runs
social-media-scheduler
Flywheel Connections
Feeds Into
social-media-scheduler(S5) — atomized pieces ready to scheduleemail-drip-sequence(S5) — email-format pieces for sequencesab-test-generator(S6) — volume mode variants for testing
Fed By
trending-content-scout(S1) — platform performance data for allocationcontent-angle-ranker(S1) — recommended angle for the pillar topicaffiliate-blog-builder(S3) — pillar content to atomizemonopoly-niche-finder(S1) — positioning angle for all piecescontent-repurposer(S7) — repurposed content to atomize further
Feedback Loop
performance-report(S6) reveals which platforms and content types perform best → focus future atomization on winning platforms
Quality Gate
Before delivering output, verify:
- Would I share this on MY personal social?
- Contains specific, surprising detail? (not generic)
- Respects reader's intelligence?
- Remarkable enough to share? (Purple Cow test)
- Irresistible offer framing? (if S4 offer skills ran)
Any NO → rewrite before delivering.
Volume Mode
When mode: "volume":
- Generate 5-10 variations per platform instead of 2-3
- Prioritize speed + variety over perfection
- Tag each with variant ID for A/B tracking
- Let data pick the winner (GaryVee philosophy)
volume_output:
variants:
- id: string # e.g., "tw-v1", "tw-v2"
content: string # The variation
angle: string # What makes this one differentReferences
shared/references/platform-rules.md— Platform-specific culture, format, and CTA rulesshared/references/ftc-compliance.md— FTC disclosure per platform typeshared/references/affitor-branding.md— Branding rulesshared/references/flywheel-connections.md— Master connection map
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

