agentleFS
Aditya923-cAditya923-c/xpoz-agent-skills/skills/competitive-intel/SKILL.md

competitive-intel

Skill6 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

Compare brands and products across social media — share of voice, sentiment, positioning, and audience overlap using Xpoz. Use when asked to "compare brands", "competitive analysis", "share of voice", "brand vs brand", or "competitive intelligence".

  • Reads credentials
  • Installs packages

19 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use pricing-strategy.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • silvainfmSkill

    pricing-strategy

    When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, or monetization strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing,' 'pricing tiers,' 'freemium,' 'free trial,' 'packaging,' 'price increase,' 'value metric,' 'Van Westendorp,' 'willingness to pay,' or 'monetization.' This skill covers pricing research, tier structure, and packaging strategy.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before fetching data, ensure Xpoz access is configured.

    line 24
  2. Distinctive:

    If this succeeds without error → skip to Step 1.

    line 35
  3. Distinctive:

    If neither works, you need to authenticate.

    line 37
  4. Very specific:

    If mcporter is available:

    line 43
  5. Very specific:

    If hasAccessKey: true → ready.

    line 49
  6. Distinctive:

    Step 3: WAIT for the user to reply with the code: Do not proceed until they respond.

    line 110
  7. Distinctive:

    Run parallel searches — one per brand, per platform.

    line 229

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Competitive Intelligence

Overview

Compare multiple brands or products side by side across Twitter/X, Reddit, and Instagram. Measure share of voice, compare sentiment, identify positioning differences, and discover competitive advantages from real social conversations.

When to Use

Activate when the user asks:

  • "Compare [BRAND A] vs [BRAND B] on social media"
  • "Share of voice: [BRAND] vs competitors"
  • "Competitive analysis for [PRODUCT]"
  • "How does [BRAND A] sentiment compare to [BRAND B]?"
  • "What are people saying about [BRAND] vs [COMPETITOR]?"

Setup & Authentication

Before fetching data, ensure Xpoz access is configured. Follow these checks in order.

Check 1: Already authenticated?

If you have MCP tools, try calling any Xpoz tool (e.g., checkAccessKeyStatus). If it works → skip to Step 1.

If you have the SDK, try:

from xpoz import XpozClient
client = XpozClient()  # reads XPOZ_API_KEY env var

If this succeeds without error → skip to Step 1.

If neither works, you need to authenticate. Choose the path that fits your environment:


Path A: MCP via mcporter (OpenClaw agents)

If mcporter is available:

mcporter call xpoz.checkAccessKeyStatus

If hasAccessKey: true → ready. If not:

mcporter config add xpoz https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp --auth oauth

Then authenticate — generate the OAuth URL and send it to the user:

Step 1: Generate authorization URL

import secrets, hashlib, base64, urllib.parse, json, urllib.request, os

verifier = secrets.token_urlsafe(64)
challenge = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(hashlib.sha256(verifier.encode()).digest()).rstrip(b'=').decode()
state = secrets.token_urlsafe(32)

# Dynamic client registration
reg_req = urllib.request.Request(
    'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/register',
    data=json.dumps({
        'client_name': 'Agent Skills',
        'redirect_uris': ['https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw'],
        'grant_types': ['authorization_code'],
        'response_types': ['code'],
        'token_endpoint_auth_method': 'none',
    }).encode(),
    headers={'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
)
reg_resp = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(reg_req).read())

params = urllib.parse.urlencode({
    'response_type': 'code',
    'client_id': reg_resp['client_id'],
    'code_challenge': challenge,
    'code_challenge_method': 'S256',
    'redirect_uri': 'https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw',
    'state': state,
    'scope': 'mcp:tools',
    'resource': 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/',
})

auth_url = 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/authorize?' + params

# Save state for token exchange
os.makedirs(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth'), exist_ok=True)
with open(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json'), 'w') as f:
    json.dump({'verifier': verifier, 'state': state, 'client_id': reg_resp['client_id'],
               'redirect_uri': 'https://www.xpoz.ai/oauth/openclaw'}, f)

print(auth_url)

Step 2: Send the URL to the user

Tell them:

"I need to connect to Xpoz for social media data. Please open this link and sign in:

[auth_url]

After authorizing, you'll see a code. Paste it back to me here."

Step 3: WAIT for the user to reply with the code. Do not proceed until they respond.

Step 4: Exchange the code for a token

Once the user provides the code (either a raw code or a URL containing ?code=...), extract the code and exchange it:

import json, urllib.request, urllib.parse, subprocess, os

with open(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json')) as f:
    oauth = json.load(f)

code = "THE_CODE_FROM_USER"  # Extract from user's reply

data = urllib.parse.urlencode({
    'grant_type': 'authorization_code',
    'code': code,
    'redirect_uri': oauth['redirect_uri'],
    'client_id': oauth['client_id'],
    'code_verifier': oauth['verifier'],
}).encode()

req = urllib.request.Request(
    'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/oauth/token',
    data=data,
    headers={'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded'},
)
resp = json.loads(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read())
token = resp['access_token']

# Configure mcporter with the token (token is never printed)
subprocess.run(['mcporter', 'config', 'remove', 'xpoz'], capture_output=True)
subprocess.run(['mcporter', 'config', 'add', 'xpoz', 'https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp',
                '--header', f'Authorization=Bearer {token}'], check=True)

# Clean up
os.remove(os.path.expanduser('~/.cache/xpoz-oauth/state.json'))
print("Xpoz configured successfully")

Step 5: Verify with mcporter call xpoz.checkAccessKeyStatus → should return hasAccessKey: true.


Path B: MCP via Claude Code config

For Claude Code users without mcporter, add to ~/.claude.json:

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "xpoz": {
      "url": "https://mcp.xpoz.ai/mcp",
      "transport": "http-stream"
    }
  }
}

Claude Code handles OAuth automatically on first tool call — the user just needs to authorize in their browser when prompted.


Path C: SDK (Python or TypeScript)

Ask the user:

"I need a Xpoz API key to access social media data. Please go to https://xpoz.ai/get-token (it's free, no credit card needed) and paste the key back to me."

WAIT for the user to reply with the key. Then:

Python:

pip install xpoz
from xpoz import XpozClient
client = XpozClient("THE_KEY_FROM_USER")

TypeScript:

npm install @xpoz/xpoz
import { XpozClient } from "@xpoz/xpoz";
const client = new XpozClient({ apiKey: "THE_KEY_FROM_USER" });
await client.connect();

Or set the environment variable and use the default constructor:

export XPOZ_API_KEY=THE_KEY_FROM_USER

Auth Errors

ProblemSolution
MCP: "Unauthorized"Re-run the OAuth flow above
SDK: AuthenticationErrorVerify key at xpoz.ai/settings
Token exchange failsAsk user to re-authorize — codes are single-use

Step-by-Step Instructions

Step 1: Parse the Request

Extract:

  • Primary brand and competitors (2-5 brands total)
  • Platforms (default: Twitter + Reddit)
  • Time period (default: last 7 days)
  • Industry context for better analysis

Build expanded queries for each brand:

  • "Slack" → "Slack" NOT "cut some slack" NOT "slack off"
  • "Discord" → "Discord" NOT "sow discord" NOT "discord between"
  • For stocks: include ticker symbols

Step 2: Fetch Data for Each Brand

Run parallel searches — one per brand, per platform.

Via MCP

For each brand, call:

Twitter posts:

Call getTwitterPostsByKeywords:
  query: "<brand query>"
  fields: ["id", "text", "authorUsername", "createdAtDate", "likeCount", "retweetCount", "impressionCount"]
  startDate: "<7 days ago>"
  endDate: "<today>"
  language: "en"

Twitter users discussing the brand:

Call getTwitterUsersByKeywords:
  query: "<brand query>"
  fields: ["id", "username", "name", "followersCount", "relevantTweetsCount", "relevantTweetsLikesSum"]
  startDate: "<7 days ago>"

Reddit (for each brand):

Call getRedditPostsByKeywords:
  query: "<brand query>"
  fields: ["id", "title", "text", "score", "numComments", "subreddit", "createdAtDate"]
  startDate: "<7 days ago>"

CRITICAL: Each call returns an operationId — poll checkOperationStatus until "completed".

Tip: Launch all brand searches in sequence, collect all operationIds, then poll them. This is faster than waiting for each one.

Via Python SDK

from xpoz import XpozClient

client = XpozClient()

brands = {
    "Slack": '"Slack" NOT "cut some slack"',
    "Discord": '"Discord" NOT "sow discord"',
    "Teams": '"Microsoft Teams" OR "MS Teams"',
}

brand_data = {}

for brand_name, query in brands.items():
    # Twitter posts
    twitter = client.twitter.search_posts(
        query,
        start_date="2026-02-16",
        end_date="2026-02-23",
        language="en",
        fields=["id", "text", "author_username", "like_count", "retweet_count", "impression_count", "created_at_date"]
    )

    # Twitter users (for influencer overlap analysis)
    users = client.twitter.get_users_by_keywords(
        query,
        start_date="2026-02-16",
        fields=["username", "followers_count", "relevant_tweets_count", "relevant_tweets_likes_sum"]
    )

    # Reddit posts
    reddit = client.reddit.search_posts(
        query,
        start_date="2026-02-16",
        fields=["id", "title", "text", "score", "num_comments", "subreddit", "created_at_date"]
    )

    brand_data[brand_name] = {
        "twitter_posts": twitter,
        "twitter_users": users,
        "reddit_posts": reddit,
        "tweet_count": twitter.pagination.total_rows,
        "reddit_count": reddit.pagination.total_rows,
    }

client.close()

Via TypeScript SDK

import { XpozClient } from "@xpoz/xpoz";

const client = new XpozClient();
await client.connect();

const brands: Record<string, string> = {
  Slack: '"Slack" NOT "cut some slack"',
  Discord: '"Discord" NOT "sow discord"',
  Teams: '"Microsoft Teams" OR "MS Teams"',
};

const brandData: Record<string, any> = {};

for (const [name, query] of Object.entries(brands)) {
  const twitter = await client.twitter.searchPosts(query, {
    startDate: "2026-02-16",
    endDate: "2026-02-23",
    language: "en",
    fields: ["id", "text", "authorUsername", "likeCount", "retweetCount", "createdAtDate"],
  });

  const reddit = await client.reddit.searchPosts(query, {
    startDate: "2026-02-16",
    fields: ["id", "title", "text", "score", "numComments", "subreddit"],
  });

  brandData[name] = { twitter, reddit };
}

await client.close();

Step 3: Analyze and Compare

Share of Voice (SOV):

SOV for Brand A = (Brand A mentions) / (Total mentions across all brands) × 100

Calculate separately for Twitter and Reddit.

Sentiment Comparison: For each brand, classify posts into positive/neutral/negative (see social-sentiment-analyzer skill for classification method) and compare:

  • Overall sentiment score (0-100)
  • Positive/negative ratio
  • Sentiment trend over the time period

Engagement Comparison:

  • Average likes per post
  • Average comments/replies per post
  • Total impressions (Twitter)
  • Total Reddit score

Audience Overlap:

  • Find users who posted about multiple brands (common usernames across datasets)
  • These users are particularly valuable for understanding switching behavior

Positioning Analysis:

  • What attributes does each brand's audience associate with it?
  • What are the unique strengths/weaknesses mentioned for each?
  • Common comparison contexts ("I switched from X to Y because...")

Step 4: Generate Report

## Competitive Intelligence: [BRAND] vs Competitors
**Period:** [date range] | **Platforms:** Twitter, Reddit

### Share of Voice
| Brand | Twitter Posts | Reddit Posts | Total | SOV |
|-------|-------------|-------------|-------|-----|
| Slack | 1,234 | 456 | 1,690 | 42% |
| Discord | 890 | 678 | 1,568 | 39% |
| Teams | 456 | 321 | 777 | 19% |

### Sentiment Comparison
| Brand | Score | Positive | Neutral | Negative | Trend |
|-------|-------|----------|---------|----------|-------|
| Slack | 62 | 38% | 42% | 20% | → Stable |
| Discord | 71 | 48% | 35% | 17% | ↑ Improving |
| Teams | 45 | 22% | 45% | 33% | ↓ Declining |

### Engagement Comparison
| Brand | Avg Likes (Twitter) | Avg Score (Reddit) | Avg Comments |
|-------|--------------------|--------------------|--------------|
| ... | ... | ... | ... |

### Key Findings

#### [Brand A] Strengths
- [What people praise, with example quotes]

#### [Brand A] Weaknesses
- [What people complain about, with example quotes]

#### [Brand B] Strengths / Weaknesses
...

### Competitive Positioning Map
- **[Brand A]:** Positioned as [description]
- **[Brand B]:** Positioned as [description]
- **Switching signals:** [users switching from X to Y, with reasons]

### Audience Overlap
[X users posted about multiple brands — analysis of their preferences]

### Recommendations
[3-5 actionable insights based on the competitive landscape]

Example Prompts

  • "Compare Tesla vs Rivian vs Lucid on Twitter sentiment"
  • "Share of voice: Figma vs Sketch vs Adobe XD"
  • "Competitive analysis for Notion vs Obsidian vs Roam Research on Reddit"
  • "How does Claude sentiment compare to ChatGPT and Gemini?"

Notes

  • Expand brand names carefully to avoid false positives (common words need exclusions)
  • Reddit provides qualitative depth; Twitter provides quantitative breadth
  • Free tier: 100K results/month at xpoz.ai
  • For large comparisons (5+ brands), use CSV exports and analyze locally with pandas/Excel

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.