refactor-plan
Skill8 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Prioritized redesign action plan covering quick wins, medium effort, and major rework. Use when the user asks for a refactor plan, a redesign plan, an improvement plan, or what they should fix first.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- momentmaker/kaijutsutheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- GangJaeYu/harness_loop_full_koreantheir own version, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- github/awesome-copilottheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- BuilderIO/agent-nativetheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- hyperledger-cacti/cactitheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- Cosmian/kmstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use pr-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillpr-review
Verify the technical accuracy of a vscode-docs pull request against the VS Code source code in microsoft/vscode. Use when reviewing a docs PR for factual correctness: setting names, command IDs, default values, API shapes, keybindings, versioned availability, and described behavior.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- BuilderIO/agent-native★ 7.6ksame name
- hyperledger-cacti/cacti★ 412same name
- Cosmian/kms★ 372same name
- GangJaeYu/harness_loop_full_korean★ 4same name
- momentmaker/kaijutsu★ 3same name
- DingGao1124/skills★ 2same name
- GA14-hub/claude-code-kit-ja★ 1same name
- khanashes/claude-skills★ 0same name
- ReaperOAK/ForgeOS★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- a11y-auditSkill
- color-auditSkill
- component-auditSkill
- design-auditSkill
- design-checklistSkill
- design-compareSkill
- design-scoreSkill
- design-tokensSkill
- flow-auditSkill
- layout-auditSkill
- style-directionSkill
- theme-builderSkill
- type-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Run quick audit across all dimensions (fast scan, not deep)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/refactor-plan: Prioritized Redesign Plan
Generate a prioritized action plan for improving the project's design.
Flow
- Run quick audit across all dimensions (fast scan, not deep)
- Score each dimension
- Rank findings by: user impact x (1 / effort)
- Group into phases:
- Quick Wins (< 1 hour): contrast fixes, focus rings, font-display swap, semantic HTML
- Medium Effort (1-4 hours): spacing consolidation, type scale, color system, loading states
- Major Rework (4+ hours): full theme rebuild, component state coverage, responsive overhaul, dark mode
- Output phased action plan
Output
Prioritized action plan with specific tasks, effort estimates, and expected impact.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.