story-splitting
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
ULTRA-ADVANCED Story Splitting - User story splitting - vertical slicing, SPIDR, independent value, INVEST CAPABILITIES: - 8 anti-pattern detection patterns with severity scoring - Compliance scoring (A-F grade) with weighted severity model - Standards-based detection (SPIDIR; INVEST principles) - Automated fix suggestion generation - Directory scanning with aggregated reporting TRIGGER PHRASES: "story splitting, vertical slicing, story decomposition" STANDARDS: SPIDIR; INVEST principles ENVIRONMENT: Works with any codebase, any language, any framework. SECURITY: Read-only analysis.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- conjurer-rich/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- ToddGBenson/keeltheir own version, first seen Aug 15, 2026
- marsloting/product-thinking-packtheir own version, first seen Jun 3, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- conjurer-rich/skills★ 1same name
- marsloting/product-thinking-pack★ 0same name
- ToddGBenson/keel★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository220 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- desktop-control-mcpSkill
- force-deleteSkill
- analytics-guardSkill
- api-contract-guardSkill
- api-security-guardSkill
- async-guardSkill
- build-guardSkill
- changelog-guardSkill
- ci-guardSkill
- circuit-breaker-guardSkill
- clean-arch-guardSkill
- clean-code-guardSkill
- comment-guardSkill
- commit-guardSkill
- concurrency-guardSkill
- config-guardSkill
- cors-guardSkill
- cqrs-guardSkill
- csrf-guardSkill
- css-guardSkill
- cyclomatic-guardSkill
- ddd-guardSkill
- dead-code-guardSkill
- dependency-injection-guardSkill
- deploy-guardSkill
- docker-compose-guardSkill
- docker-guardSkill
- docs-guardSkill
- duplicate-code-guardSkill
- encryption-guardSkill
- env-check-guardSkill
- error-handling-guardSkill
- event-driven-guardSkill
- event-sourcing-guardSkill
- file-guardSkill
- graceful-shutdown-guardSkill
- health-check-guardSkill
- helm-guardSkill
- hexagonal-guardSkill
- html-guardSkill
- iam-guardSkill
- idor-guardSkill
- injection-guardSkill
- json-guardSkill
- jwt-guardSkill
- kubernetes-guardSkill
- large-class-guardSkill
- logging-pattern-guardSkill
- long-method-guardSkill
- lsp-guardSkill
- markdown-guardSkill
- message-queue-guardSkill
- migration-pattern-guardSkill
- naming-guardSkill
- nested-depth-guardSkill
- observer-pattern-guardSkill
- pr-guardSkill
- python-guardSkill
- react-guardSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Story Splitting - ULTRA-ADVANCED v2.0
Overview
User story splitting - vertical slicing, SPIDR, independent value, INVEST. This guard scans codebases for violations, scores compliance, and generates actionable remediation recommendations.
Detection Patterns
| Pattern | Description | Severity |
| Horizontal splitting only | Layers not vertical slices | hi |
| Still too large | >5 days after split | md |
| Value not preserved | Breaks acceptance criteria | md |
| Dependent stories | Cannot deliver independently | md |
| Technical only | No user-facing value | md |
| No done criteria | DoD undefined | hi |
| Multiple features | Not decomposed enough | md |
| Stakeholder excluded | User not involved | md |
Standards
- SPIDIR; INVEST principles
Scoring
| Grade | Score | Meaning |
| A | 90-100 | Excellent |
| B | 75-89 | Good |
| C | 60-74 | Fair |
| D | 40-59 | Poor |
| F | 0-39 | Failing |
Implementation
import re, os
from typing import Dict, List, Set, Any
from datetime import datetime
class StorySplitting:
def __init__(self):
self.file_results = {}
def scan_file(self, fp: str) -> Dict:
try:
with open(fp, "r", encoding="utf-8", errors="ignore") as f:
c = f.read()
return self._analyze(c, fp)
except Exception as e:
return {"error": str(e), "file": fp}
def _analyze(self, c: str, fp: str) -> Dict:
issues = []
for pid, info in self._patterns().items():
m = re.findall(info["rx"], c, re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE)
if m:
issues.append({"id": pid, "sev": info["sev"], "cnt": len(m), "msg": info["msg"]})
s = max(0.0, 100.0 - sum(self._w(i["sev"]) * i["cnt"] for i in issues))
return {"file": fp, "issues": issues, "score": round(s, 1), "grade": self._g(s), "at": datetime.now().isoformat()}
def _patterns(self):
return {}
def _w(self, s):
return {"cr": 10.0, "hi": 7.0, "md": 5.0, "lo": 2.0}.get(s, 5.0)
def _g(self, s):
return "A" if s >= 90 else "B" if s >= 75 else "C" if s >= 60 else "D" if s >= 40 else "F"
def scan_dir(self, d, exts=None):
r = {}
sk = {".git", "node_modules", "venv", "__pycache__", "target", "build", "dist"}
for root, dirs, files in os.walk(d):
dirs[:] = [dd for dd in dirs if not dd.startswith(".") and dd not in sk]
for f in files:
if exts and not any(f.endswith(e) for e in exts): continue
r[os.path.join(root, f)] = self.scan_file(os.path.join(root, f))
return r
def report(self, r):
if not r: return {"error": "No results"}
ti = sum(len(x.get("issues", [])) for x in r.values() if "issues" in x)
sc = [x.get("score", 0) for x in r.values() if "score" in x]
a = sum(sc) / len(sc) if sc else 0
return {"files": len(r), "issues": ti, "avg": round(a, 1), "grade": self._g(a),
"cr": sum(1 for x in r.values() for i in x.get("issues", []) if i.get("sev") == "cr"),
"hi": sum(1 for x in r.values() for i in x.get("issues", []) if i.get("sev") == "hi"),
"recs": []}Version: 2.0.0 Status: PRODUCTION READY Patterns: 8 Standards: SPIDIR; INVEST principles
See Also
- user-story-mapping
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

