agentleFS
Abdox-menaraAbdox-menara/guard-skills/skills/workflow/code-review-workflow/SKILL.md

code-review-workflow

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

ULTRA-ADVANCED Code Review Workflow - Code review process - review types, checklists, feedback patterns, turnaround time

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Code Review Workflow - ULTRA-ADVANCED v1.0

Overview

Code review process - review types, checklists, feedback patterns, turnaround time. This skill scans codebases for violations, scores compliance, and generates actionable recommendations.

Detection Patterns

PatternDescriptionSeverity
PR too largeMore than 400 lines per reviewmedium
Slow review turnaroundOver 24 hours for initial reviewhigh
Nitpicking styleStyle comments dominate substancelow
Missing PR descriptionNo context provided for reviewhigh
Comments unresolvedReview thread abandoned without resolutionmedium

Scoring

  • A (90-100): Excellent
  • B (75-89): Good
  • C (60-74): Fair
  • D (40-59): Poor
  • F (0-39): Failing

Implementation

import re, os
from typing import Dict, List, Set, Any
from datetime import datetime

class CodeReviewWorkflow:
    def __init__(self):
        self.file_results = {}

    def scan_file(self, file_path: str) -> Dict:
        try:
            with open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as f:
                content = f.read()
            return self._analyze(content, file_path)
        except Exception as e:
            return {'error': str(e), 'file': file_path}

    def _analyze(self, content: str, file_path: str) -> Dict:
        issues = []
        for pid, info in self._patterns().items():
            matches = re.findall(info['regex'], content, re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE)
            if matches:
                issues.append({'id': pid, 'severity': info['severity'],
                               'count': len(matches), 'message': info['message']})
        score = max(0.0, 100.0 - sum(self._weight(i['severity']) * i['count'] for i in issues))
        return {'file': file_path, 'issues': issues, 'score': round(score, 1),
                 'grade': self._grade(score), 'analyzed_at': datetime.now().isoformat()}

    def _patterns(self) -> Dict:
        return {}

    def _weight(self, s: str) -> float:
        return {'critical': 10.0, 'high': 7.0, 'medium': 5.0, 'low': 2.0}.get(s, 5.0)

    def _grade(self, s: float) -> str:
        return 'A' if s >= 90 else 'B' if s >= 75 else 'C' if s >= 60 else 'D' if s >= 40 else 'F'

    def scan_directory(self, d: str, exts: Set[str] = None) -> Dict:
        results = {}
        skip = {'.git', 'node_modules', 'venv', '__pycache__', 'target', 'build', 'dist'}
        for root, dirs, files in os.walk(d):
            dirs[:] = [dd for dd in dirs if not dd.startswith('.') and dd not in skip]
            for f in files:
                if exts and not any(f.endswith(e) for e in exts): continue
                results[os.path.join(root, f)] = self.scan_file(os.path.join(root, f))
        return results

    def generate_report(self, results: Dict) -> Dict:
        if not results: return {'error': 'No results'}
        total_issues = sum(len(r.get('issues', [])) for r in results.values() if 'issues' in r)
        scores = [r.get('score', 0) for r in results.values() if 'score' in r]
        avg = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
        return {'files_scanned': len(results), 'total_issues': total_issues,
                 'avg_score': round(avg, 1), 'grade': self._grade(avg),
                 'critical': sum(1 for r in results.values() for i in r.get('issues', []) if i.get('severity') == 'critical'),
                 'recommendations': []}

Version: 1.0.0 Status: PRODUCTION READY Total Patterns: 5

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.