cicd-pipeline
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
ULTRA-ADVANCED Cicd Pipeline - CI/CD pipeline design - stages, gates, caching, optimization, security scanning
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- SWEStash/swe-workflow-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- NinjaSln-labs/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 2, 2026
- timwukp/agent-skills-best-practicetheir own version, first seen Sep 16, 2026
- leomajewski/skills-somethingtheir own version, first seen Sep 1, 2026
- drewid74/ai_skillstheir own version, first seen May 20, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- timwukp/agent-skills-best-practice★ 10same name
- drewid74/ai_skills★ 8same name
- d-o-hub/github-template-ai-agents★ 2same name
- albertdobmeyer/openskill-forge★ 1same name
- mmondora/claude-skills★ 1same name
- NinjaSln-labs/agent-skills★ 1same name
- SWEStash/swe-workflow-skills★ 1same name
- herbert051281/mission-control★ 0same name
- leomajewski/skills-something★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository220 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- desktop-control-mcpSkill
- force-deleteSkill
- analytics-guardSkill
- api-contract-guardSkill
- api-security-guardSkill
- async-guardSkill
- build-guardSkill
- changelog-guardSkill
- ci-guardSkill
- circuit-breaker-guardSkill
- clean-arch-guardSkill
- clean-code-guardSkill
- comment-guardSkill
- commit-guardSkill
- concurrency-guardSkill
- config-guardSkill
- cors-guardSkill
- cqrs-guardSkill
- csrf-guardSkill
- css-guardSkill
- cyclomatic-guardSkill
- ddd-guardSkill
- dead-code-guardSkill
- dependency-injection-guardSkill
- deploy-guardSkill
- docker-compose-guardSkill
- docker-guardSkill
- docs-guardSkill
- duplicate-code-guardSkill
- encryption-guardSkill
- env-check-guardSkill
- error-handling-guardSkill
- event-driven-guardSkill
- event-sourcing-guardSkill
- file-guardSkill
- graceful-shutdown-guardSkill
- health-check-guardSkill
- helm-guardSkill
- hexagonal-guardSkill
- html-guardSkill
- iam-guardSkill
- idor-guardSkill
- injection-guardSkill
- json-guardSkill
- jwt-guardSkill
- kubernetes-guardSkill
- large-class-guardSkill
- logging-pattern-guardSkill
- long-method-guardSkill
- lsp-guardSkill
- markdown-guardSkill
- message-queue-guardSkill
- migration-pattern-guardSkill
- naming-guardSkill
- nested-depth-guardSkill
- observer-pattern-guardSkill
- pr-guardSkill
- python-guardSkill
- react-guardSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
Cicd Pipeline - ULTRA-ADVANCED v1.0
Overview
CI/CD pipeline design - stages, gates, caching, optimization, security scanning. This skill scans codebases for violations, scores compliance, and generates actionable recommendations.
Detection Patterns
| Pattern | Description | Severity |
| Missing test stage | No automated tests in pipeline | critical |
| Long pipeline time | Pipeline exceeds 30 minutes | medium |
| No caching | Dependencies reinstalled every run | medium |
| No artifact versioning | Build outputs not uniquely tagged | high |
| No security scan | SAST or dependency scan missing | high |
Scoring
- A (90-100): Excellent
- B (75-89): Good
- C (60-74): Fair
- D (40-59): Poor
- F (0-39): Failing
Implementation
import re, os
from typing import Dict, List, Set, Any
from datetime import datetime
class CicdPipeline:
def __init__(self):
self.file_results = {}
def scan_file(self, file_path: str) -> Dict:
try:
with open(file_path, 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as f:
content = f.read()
return self._analyze(content, file_path)
except Exception as e:
return {'error': str(e), 'file': file_path}
def _analyze(self, content: str, file_path: str) -> Dict:
issues = []
for pid, info in self._patterns().items():
matches = re.findall(info['regex'], content, re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE)
if matches:
issues.append({'id': pid, 'severity': info['severity'],
'count': len(matches), 'message': info['message']})
score = max(0.0, 100.0 - sum(self._weight(i['severity']) * i['count'] for i in issues))
return {'file': file_path, 'issues': issues, 'score': round(score, 1),
'grade': self._grade(score), 'analyzed_at': datetime.now().isoformat()}
def _patterns(self) -> Dict:
return {}
def _weight(self, s: str) -> float:
return {'critical': 10.0, 'high': 7.0, 'medium': 5.0, 'low': 2.0}.get(s, 5.0)
def _grade(self, s: float) -> str:
return 'A' if s >= 90 else 'B' if s >= 75 else 'C' if s >= 60 else 'D' if s >= 40 else 'F'
def scan_directory(self, d: str, exts: Set[str] = None) -> Dict:
results = {}
skip = {'.git', 'node_modules', 'venv', '__pycache__', 'target', 'build', 'dist'}
for root, dirs, files in os.walk(d):
dirs[:] = [dd for dd in dirs if not dd.startswith('.') and dd not in skip]
for f in files:
if exts and not any(f.endswith(e) for e in exts): continue
results[os.path.join(root, f)] = self.scan_file(os.path.join(root, f))
return results
def generate_report(self, results: Dict) -> Dict:
if not results: return {'error': 'No results'}
total_issues = sum(len(r.get('issues', [])) for r in results.values() if 'issues' in r)
scores = [r.get('score', 0) for r in results.values() if 'score' in r]
avg = sum(scores) / len(scores) if scores else 0
return {'files_scanned': len(results), 'total_issues': total_issues,
'avg_score': round(avg, 1), 'grade': self._grade(avg),
'critical': sum(1 for r in results.values() for i in r.get('issues', []) if i.get('severity') == 'critical'),
'recommendations': []}Version: 1.0.0 Status: PRODUCTION READY Total Patterns: 5
See Also
- data-pipeline-workflow
- ml-pipeline-workflow
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

