keyword-opportunities
Skill7 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants the best untapped keywords for an app tracked in ASOScan (gap-scored suggestions ranked by opportunity score, each showing which competitors already rank for the term). Also use when the user mentions "what keywords should I target", "find keyword opportunities", "what am I missing", "keyword gaps vs my competitors", or "suggest keywords to add". Can also start tracking the chosen terms. For validating a specific term's volume/difficulty, see keyword-intelligence.
- Reads credentials
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- khadinakbarlabs/ai-visibility-trackertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- khadinakbarlabs/ai-visibility-tracker★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- aso-fundamentalsSkill
- asoscan-routerSkill
- asoscan-setupSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- keyword-intelligenceSkill
- keyword-spySkill
- metadata-auditSkill
- review-insightsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 81
If the user approves tracking, call the write endpoint and report added/skipped.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Keyword Opportunities
Answer "what should I target next?" with ASOScan's pre-computed, opportunity-scored suggestions, then track the winners, all from real numbers.
When to use
- "What keywords should I add / target?"
- "Where are my keyword gaps vs competitors?"
- "Suggest high-opportunity keywords for my app."
Getting the data (two modes)
Pick the first mode that applies, then follow the steps below.
- ASOScan tools are connected (the ASOScan plugin or connector in ChatGPT or Claude, or any MCP client): use the tool named in the table. Do not ask for an API key and do not run
curl. Tool results have the same fields as the API responses below, and a list comes back insideitems. If a tool answers with a message instead of data (reconnect, credits used up, plan limit, "preparing"), pass that message on and stop. - No tools, but you can run shell commands and
ASOSCAN_API_KEYis set: make the API call in the table. Basehttps://asoscan.com/api/public/v1, headerAuthorization: Bearer $ASOSCAN_API_KEY, JSON with camelCase fields. Never print the key. Capture the HTTP status and handle errors as described at the bottom. - Neither: hand off to asoscan-setup. It explains how to connect ASOScan in ChatGPT or Claude, or how to create an API key.
ASOScan only sees the apps in the user's own account and the competitors they track. Every call uses API credits (failed calls are free). Before a call that costs more than 2 API credits, or one that uses AI, tell the user the cost and wait for a yes. Before any call that changes data, ask first.
| Step | Tool (connected) | API call (key) | API credits |
| Find the app | list_my_apps | GET /apps | free |
| Opportunities | find_keyword_opportunities | GET /apps/{id}/opportunities?country=&limit=50 | 2 |
| Validate a finalist | research_keyword | GET /apps/{id}/keywords/research?term=&country= | 8, say the cost first |
| Track the picks (changes data) | track_keywords | POST /apps/{id}/keywords with { "terms": [...], "country": "US" } | 2, ask first |
Steps
- Find the app —
GET /apps→ use theid. - Opportunities —
GET /apps/{id}/opportunities?country=&limit=50(2 credits, limit 1–200). Each row:{ term, volume, difficulty, opportunityScore, competitorRanks[]{ name, rank, isYou } }. There is no "source" field — rank byopportunityScoreand readcompetitorRanksfor context (the entry withisYou: trueis the owner;rank: nullthere = you don't rank yet). - (Optional) validate a shortlisted term — the research call in keyword-intelligence (8 credits), for a few finalists only.
- (Optional) track the picks —
POST /apps/{id}/keywordswith{ "terms": [...], "country": "US" }(2 credits, needs a write key; up to 500 terms) →{ added[], skipped[]{ term, reason } }.
How to prioritize
Sort by opportunityScore, then sanity-check each candidate:
- Relevant? Would a searcher for this term actually want this app? Drop off-topic high-volume terms — irrelevant installs churn.
- Winnable? Is
difficultyrealistic for this app's authority? - A real gap? In
competitorRanks,isYouhas a null/poor rank while rivals rank well → the sharpest opportunity.
Group into Quick wins (high score, low difficulty, relevant, you don't rank) and Watchlist (promising but harder / needs validation).
Output template
### Keyword opportunities — {App} ({country}) · credits left: {remaining}
**Quick wins** (track these)
| Keyword | Volume | Difficulty | Score | You rank? | Rivals ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| … | … | … | … | no | Rival A #4, Rival B #9 |
**Watchlist**
| Keyword | Volume | Difficulty | Score | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
**Next in ASOScan:** track the quick wins → track_keywords or POST /apps/{id}/keywords,
then place them with `metadata-audit`.If the user approves tracking, call the write endpoint and report added/skipped.
Errors, credits & honesty
401→ asoscan-setup ·403= no API access or a read-only key on the write call (tell them to create a read + write key) ·402out of credits ·429back off ·503not enabled yet. Opportunities = 2 credits, tracking = 2.- Present numbers cleanly; never track terms without asking; don't overpromise ranks.
- Full reference: https://asoscan.com/api/developers
Related
- keyword-intelligence — validate a shortlisted term.
- competitor-analysis — see which competitors drive the gap.
- metadata-audit — place the chosen keywords into the listing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

