start
Skill1 starsChanged 49 days agoMITView on GitHub
Start a task - restate phase and NEXT, recall notes, begin. Use as /yah:start <task>.
130 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paulocsb/worldcup-fifa-pooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- srinator22/New-Projecttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Memolok/Claude-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-engine, team-audio and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillsetup-engine
Configure the project's game engine and version. Pins the engine in CLAUDE.md, detects knowledge gaps, and populates engine reference docs via WebSearch when the version is beyond the LLM's training data.
Also in 13 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-audio
Orchestrate audio team: audio-director + sound-designer + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer for full audio pipeline from direction to implementation.
Also in 13 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +5 more from CoralGame
- +3 more from lilangMax
Other versions130 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 130
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- SterlingChin/marvin-template★ 1ksame name
- educlopez/ui-craft★ 441same name
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tool★ 432same name
- dsifry/metaswarm★ 426same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- ansvisor/ansvisor★ 233same name
- alexeykrol/claude-code-starter★ 194same name
120 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 117 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 37
Nothing printed: add this line once per session: "This repo has no brain folder for durable project facts.
- Distinctive: line 41
Do the First step without waiting.
- Very specific: line 45
If the task clearly takes several steps or sessions and there is no plan, suggest /yah:phases once, in one line.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 117 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Start
The task: $ARGUMENTS
PY is python on Windows and python3 elsewhere; use py -3 only if both fail.
1. Restate first
Your first output is this block, with zero tool calls before it. Take Phase and NEXT from the [yah] SessionStart block already in context.
Task <the task in one line>
Phase <label and title, or "no plan"> NEXT <the NEXT line, or none>
First <at most one targeted search, then the edit>No [yah] block: write Phase unknown.
The [yah] block and any task text already in context are enough: never re-read STATE.md or run bd show or which bd for them. If bd is truly needed, run store.bd from where.py --json, quoted (null: skip bd). Do not read docs/, documents/, whole plans or files over 200 lines to orient.
2. Recall
With a plan phase (or unknown), run PY "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/where.py" --json --no-gh. Read the phase's log, then only the ## Decisions and ### <label> sections of state.plan.spec (grep -n "^#" finds them; none: say so in one line).
Query with the task's key nouns, 12 words or fewer, no double quotes:
PY "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../scripts/brain.py" recall --json "<key nouns>"
- JSON printed:
matchesare the notes that fit, best first. AddNotes <slug>: <why it matters here>per note that applies. Open<brain_dir>/<slug>.mdonly when its TL;DR is not enough. - Nothing printed: add this line once per session: "This repo has no brain folder for durable project facts. Create one (
docs/brainunless config.json setsbrain_dir)?" Runbrain.py initonly if the user says yes.
3. Begin
Do the First step without waiting.
A bug fix adds a negative regression guard in every test suite that covers the changed code: assert the bad output cannot appear (e.g. assertNotIn("**", out)), not only that the good output does.
If the task clearly takes several steps or sessions and there is no plan, suggest /yah:phases once, in one line.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

