agentleFS
AI-Degen-69AI-Degen-69/issue-to-pr-skills/docs/agents.md

issue-to-pr-skills

AGENTS.md0 starsChanged 51 days agoMITView on GitHub

Specialist personas dispatched by Stations II–V based on the diff. A persona missing from disk is skipped and recorded — never simulated. Copy the closest agents/*.md, keep the role narrow (one stack or axis), and make sure at least one station's routing table can reach it. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

The file

We split this agents.md into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If agents/<name>.md is missing, that reviewer is skipped — not simulated.

    line 10

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
agents.md

Agents — Reviewer Personas

Specialist personas dispatched by Stations II–V based on the diff. A persona missing from disk is skipped and recorded — never simulated.

Dispatch Rules

  1. Station II detects stack and writes the reviewer set into tasks/plan.md.
  2. Station IV fans out to diff-matched reviewers in parallel; the Spec axis runs separately.
  3. Station V reuses prior review evidence; only new delta is re-reviewed.
  4. If agents/<name>.md is missing, that reviewer is skipped — not simulated.

Catalog

AgentRoleTriggers on
code-reviewerGeneral quality, five-axis reviewevery PR
security-reviewerOWASP, auth, secretsauth, input, secrets in diff
typescript-reviewerTS/JS types, async, Node*.ts, *.js
react-reviewerHooks, a11y, RSC, perf*.tsx, *.jsx
python-reviewerasyncio, typing, PEP 8*.py
go-reviewergoroutines, errors*.go
rust-reviewerlifetimes, unsafe*.rs
database-reviewerSQL/ORM, N+1, indexesmigrations, queries
silent-failure-hunterSwallowed errors, lost tracestry/catch, empty handles
tdd-guideWrite-tests-firststation III per task
type-design-analyzerInterface/domain designAPI, schema changes
code-explorerPath tracingunfamiliar code
doc-updaterDocs driftbehavior changes
build-error-resolverGeneric build failuresbuild breaks
react-build-resolverReact buildReact build breaks
go-build-resolverGo buildGo build breaks
rust-build-resolverRust buildRust build breaks

Adding a New Agent

Copy the closest agents/*.md, keep the role narrow (one stack or axis), and make sure at least one station's routing table can reach it. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.