agentleFS
AI-AnswerAI-Answer/Agent-Club/.claude/skills/testing/SKILL.md

testing

Skill9 starsChanged 8 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Testing workflow and quality standards for writing and running tests. Use when: (1) Writing new tests, (2) Adding a new feature that needs tests, (3) Modifying logic that has existing tests, (4) Before claiming a task is complete.

194 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use bundle-dependency-prs, update-library-template and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    bundle-dependency-prs

    Fix broken dependency update PRs and aggregate the ones that work into one PR.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    update-library-template

    Merges the latest Library.Template into this repo (at position of HEAD) and resolves conflicts.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • zetaloopSkill

    assign-copilot

    Assigns a GitHub issue to the Copilot coding agent, optionally specifying a custom agent. Use this when asked to assign an issue to Copilot or delegate an issue to CCA.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIA-NeMoSkill

    build-and-dependency

    Dev environment setup for Megatron Bridge — container-based development, uv package management, lockfile regeneration, adding dependencies, Slurm container usage, and common build pitfalls.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • timmo001Skill

    changeset-scope

    Keep all scoped code work contained to the user-defined changeset. Use for implementation, fixes, diagnosis, refactoring, cleanup, and review when explicit instructions, named files, diffs, branches, pull requests, or injected work scopes define the boundary.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • JetBrainsSkill

    module-dependencies

    Add or modify IntelliJ module dependencies in `.iml` files.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 172 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before claiming work is complete

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Before writing tests, list the riskiest scenarios first:

    line 48
  3. Distinctive:

    Follow these quality rules:

    line 56
  4. Very specific:

    Keep each it() focused. More than 3 expect() calls in one test is a signal it is testing too much at once.

    line 75
  5. Distinctive:

    After writing a test, mentally delete the core logic it targets.

    line 79
  6. Distinctive:

    When modifying logic, check if existing tests need updating:

    line 100
  7. Distinctive:

    If a test fails because the behavior changed intentionally, update the test.

    line 106
  8. Distinctive:

    When testing a module, verify:

    line 110

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 172 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Testing Skill

Standards and workflow for writing and running tests. Every feature must be tested.

Announce at start: "I'm using testing skill to ensure proper test coverage."

Trigger Conditions

  • Writing new tests for a feature or bug fix
  • Adding a new feature (must include tests)
  • Modifying logic that has existing tests (must update them)
  • Before claiming work is complete
  • Before committing code

Framework

Vitest 4 — configured in vitest.config.ts.

Test Structure

tests/
├── unit/          # Individual functions, utilities, components
├── integration/   # IPC, database, service interactions
├── regression/    # Regression test cases
└── e2e/           # End-to-end tests (Playwright, playwright.config.ts)

Two Test Environments

EnvironmentWhenFile naming
node (default)Main process, utilities, services*.test.ts
jsdomDOM/browser-dependent code*.dom.test.ts

Workflow

Step 1: Identify What to Test

Before writing tests, list the riskiest scenarios first:

  • What happens when the dependency returns undefined / throws?
  • What happens at boundaries (empty list, max retries, past timestamp)?
  • What is most likely to break in production?

Step 2: Write Tests

Follow these quality rules:

1. Describe behavior, not code structure

// Wrong — describes implementation
it('should call repo.getConversation', ...)

// Correct — describes behavior
it('should return cached task without hitting repo on second call', ...)
it('should reject with error when conversation does not exist', ...)

2. Every describe block must cover at least one failure path

Happy-path-only tests leave the most dangerous code untested.

3. One behavior per test

Keep each it() focused. More than 3 expect() calls in one test is a signal it is testing too much at once.

4. Self-check

After writing a test, mentally delete the core logic it targets. If the test would still pass, rewrite it — it is not guarding anything.

5. Start from risk, not from coverage gaps

List scenarios most likely to produce bugs. Write those first. Coverage is the outcome, not the starting point.

Step 3: Run Tests

bun run test              # Run all tests (REQUIRED before every commit)
bun run test:coverage     # Check coverage (before opening a PR)

Step 4: Verify Coverage

Coverage target: ≥ 80% for all source files matched by vitest.config.ts → coverage.include (currently src/**/*.{ts,tsx} plus a few scripts).

New source files are automatically included in coverage — no manual config changes needed. If a new file is accidentally excluded by a rule in coverage.exclude, remove it from the exclude list.

Step 5: Update Existing Tests

When modifying logic, check if existing tests need updating:

bun run test -- --reporter=verbose   # See which tests pass/fail with names

If a test fails because the behavior changed intentionally, update the test. If it fails unexpectedly, investigate.

Edge Case Checklist

When testing a module, verify:

  • null / undefined inputs handled
  • Empty arrays/objects handled
  • Error thrown by dependencies handled
  • Boundary values (0, -1, max, empty string)
  • Async operations (timeout, rejection, cancellation)

Quick Checklist

Before submitting code:

  • New features have corresponding test cases
  • Modified logic has updated tests
  • bun run test passes
  • Tests describe behavior, not implementation
  • At least one failure path per describe block
  • New source files are not accidentally excluded by coverage.exclude
  • bun run test:coverage meets ≥ 80% target

Common Mistakes

MistakeCorrect
Testing implementation detailsTest observable behavior
Only testing happy pathMust include at least one failure path
5+ expects in one it()Split into separate tests
Skipping tests for "simple" codeSimple code breaks too — test the risky parts
Writing tests after saying "done"Tests are part of "done", not an afterthought

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.