agentleFS
ADWilkinsonADWilkinson/astack/skills/oneshot/SKILL.md

oneshot

Skill0 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use only when explicitly requested as \"oneshot\" or \"full send\": implement, merge, deploy and verify live within the user's scope, then send any authorized delivery update.

10 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brainstorm.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • nicolasestremSkill

    brainstorm

    Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If the user did not clearly ask for oneshot, do not assume this level of autonomy.

    line 11
  2. Very specific:

    do everything astack may do without asking.

    line 19
  3. Distinctive:

    use proportionate test methods, including browsers, simulators and running the app, within the task's existing testing authority.

    line 24
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep one working plan with the acceptance criteria and evidence.

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    Use the client's available question mechanism with the PR link, the blocker and your recommendation.

    line 46
  6. Distinctive:

    If no question tool exists or nobody answers, take the safe path: leave the PR open and unmerged (or the deploy on its last good revision) …

    line 54

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

oneshot

Own the work from its current state to the authorized live result, with serving proof and any authorized delivery update.

If the user did not clearly ask for oneshot, do not assume this level of autonomy; use astack instead.

<skill-dir> means this skill's folder. Run its scripts from the project root.

The grant

An explicit oneshot request sets the end-to-end delivery intent for this task. Follow the user's actual scope, repository gates and any narrower authority. The delivery path may include:

  • do everything astack may do without asking;
  • merge the PR once the merge gate passes, with the repo's merge method;
  • force-push the PR's own branch with --force-with-lease after a rebase;
  • deploy through the repo's documented pipeline to the target the user named, or to production when the repo deploys on merge;
  • post a delivery update when the user authorized that destination;
  • use proportionate test methods, including browsers, simulators and running the app, within the task's existing testing authority.

It does not cover: deleting data, spending money, changing secrets or permissions, touching other repos or other people's branches, or messaging anyone else. A harness approval prompt still applies.

Steps

Keep one working plan with the acceptance criteria and evidence. Load supporting skills only for procedures the current step needs.

  1. Implement and verify: settle context that changes the work, build in the repo's conventions, exercise the real journey, verify relevant measurement and clean the diff. Required checks and affected behavior decide whether the change works. Add independent review when risk, subjective quality or repository rules call for it.
  2. Open the PR and get it to no blockers with ship: CI classified and fixed, every review thread fixed or answered with a reason.
  3. Merge gate. All true on the latest head: proof covers every change in the diff; required checks green; any required independent review covers this head with no unresolved defects; review bots finished and each finding fixed or dismissed with a reason; no human review requesting changes; branch up to date and mergeable. git fetch and re-read the PR immediately before merging. Never --admin or any bypass.
  4. Merge, then read it back. A queued merge or armed auto-merge is not a merge; stay until GitHub reports the PR merged.
  5. Deploy and prove it. Deploy the way the repo deploys, then node <skill-dir>/scripts/verify-live.mjs must find the deployed commit or the changed content at the real URL, and you exercise the changed behaviour there.
  6. Send an authorized update to the destination the user approved: what users can now do, the state that is true (live, merged, blocked), and the PR and live links. Check for an earlier update about the same change, scan for secrets and private data, send once, read it back and keep the permalink. If no destination is authorized, report here.
  7. Report in your final message: outcome, PR and merge commit, live proof, verification method and any independent verdict, decisions you made, anything not verified.

Never stop early

Ending your turn while checks, reviews, a merge queue or a deploy are pending ends the work. Wait with node <skill-dir>/scripts/pr-state.mjs --watch and node <skill-dir>/scripts/verify-live.mjs <url> --expect <sha> --poll 900, run as background tasks or under your harness's monitor.

Asking the user

Use the client's available question mechanism with the PR link, the blocker and your recommendation. Reuse existing authority. Ask only when:

  • you cannot prove a change;
  • the merge gate cannot pass and you cannot fix it yourself;
  • the deploy fails in a way you cannot diagnose and fix, or would need a rollback;
  • the next step is outside the grant;
  • the goal is ambiguous in a way that changes the result.

If no question tool exists or nobody answers, take the safe path: leave the PR open and unmerged (or the deploy on its last good revision) and start your final message with the question.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.