pr-comment
Skill143 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user asks to write, draft, summarize, or compose a pull request description or change summary. Covers reviewer-facing PR bodies, strict Summary plus Key Changes formatting, and issue-closing keywords when the linked issue is known.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- warrisk-no/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flowtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harnesstheir own version, first seen Oct 6, 2026
- MadAppGang/claudishtheir own version, first seen Aug 4, 2026
- napnap11/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 26, 2026
- BenjaminG/ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Jun 2, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use plan-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
YougLin-devSkillplan-review
Reviews and adjusts PRD plans based on research findings. Use after completing research to evaluate story modifications. Triggers on: review plan, adjust stories, update prd based on research.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- MadAppGang/claudish★ 1ksame name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-dev-flow★ 192same name
- sd0xdev/sd0x-harness★ 192same name
- BenjaminG/ai-skills★ 4same name
- napnap11/claude-skills★ 1same name
- warrisk-no/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- migrate-radix-to-baseSkill
- shadcnSkill
- transitions-devSkill
- 8sl-component-shipSkill
- 8sl-consume-registrySkill
- 8sl-pattern-reviewSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- transitions-devSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Use ## Summary and ## Key Changes.
- Distinctive: line 16
Do not add prose before or after the fenced block.
- Distinctive: line 17
Keep the write-up concise and copy-paste ready.
- Distinctive: line 66
Do not restate the summary or enumerate every touched file.
- Distinctive: line 71
Prefer direct reviewer-facing language.
- Distinctive: line 72
Keep the body tight; cut preamble like "This PR" or "In this change".
- Distinctive: line 73
Use root-cause framing when it clarifies a bug fix.
- Very specific: line 78
If the linked issue is known and the change resolves it, include a closing line such as Closes #43.
- Distinctive: line 80
If issue linkage is ambiguous, leave it out unless the user asked for it.
- Distinctive: line 81
Put the closing line at the end of the markdown block.
- Distinctive: line 85
If the user gave a diff but not enough context, ask at most once for:
- Distinctive: line 89
If the user already explained the change well enough, write immediately.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PR Comment
This skill writes PR descriptions and change summaries for reviewers. It does not handle inline review replies or generic issue comments.
Output rules
- Output only one fenced
markdownblock. - Use
## Summaryand## Key Changes. - Include issue-closing text like
Closes #43when appropriate and known. - Do not add prose before or after the fenced block.
- Keep the write-up concise and copy-paste ready.
Apply this skill when
- the user says "write a PR", "draft a PR", "summarize this PR", or "describe this diff"
- the user wants a reviewer-facing change summary
- the user shares a diff or changed files and wants a polished PR body
Goals
- Tell the reviewer what changed in user-visible terms.
- Explain why the diff exists, especially the root cause.
- Group the key changes without dumping a file-by-file changelog.
- Include issue-closing language when there is a linked issue.
Format
## Summary
<one short paragraph, usually 2-4 sentences>
## Key Changes
<1-3 bullets for a small change, or grouped bullets by area for a larger one>
Closes #<issue>## Summary
The summary should cover:
- what changed
- where it changed
- why it changed
Lead with the user-visible surface or workflow. Include the root cause when it helps the reviewer understand why the diff exists.
## Key Changes
- Small change: use 1-3 bullets total.
- Multi-area change:
group bullets by area with a plain label line such as
Registry:orDocs:. - Name specific symbols, files, commands, or surfaces only when that increases reviewer understanding.
- Do not restate the summary or enumerate every touched file.
Style rules
- Backticks for file paths, commands, symbols, and config keys.
- Prefer direct reviewer-facing language.
- Keep the body tight; cut preamble like "This PR" or "In this change".
- Use root-cause framing when it clarifies a bug fix.
- Ground claims in the visible diff or in user-provided context.
Issue-closing rules
- If the linked issue is known and the change resolves it, include a closing
line such as
Closes #43. - If issue linkage is ambiguous, leave it out unless the user asked for it.
- Put the closing line at the end of the markdown block.
Ask only if needed
If the user gave a diff but not enough context, ask at most once for:
- the main user-visible surface affected
- whether an issue number should be closed
If the user already explained the change well enough, write immediately.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

