content-quality
Skill5 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Evaluate content substance, word count thresholds by page profile, answer-first openings, extractable tables and lists, FAQ sections, and semantic HTML landmarks (<main>/<article>).
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- one-step-seoSkill
- accessibility-seoSkill
- answer-engine-optimizationSkill
- core-web-vitalsSkill
- duplicate-contentSkill
- ecommerce-seoSkill
- entity-optimizationSkill
- geo-optimizationSkill
- http-statusSkill
- image-seoSkill
- internal-linkingSkill
- international-seoSkill
- javascript-seoSkill
- llms-txtSkill
- local-seoSkill
- onpage-optimizationSkill
- schema-validationSkill
- security-hygieneSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- seo-fixSkill
- seo-regressionSkill
- sitemap-robotsSkill
- social-metadataSkill
- technical-seoSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 31
If C01-thin fires, identify missing subtopics, specifications, or user questions that should be answered on the page.
- Very specific: line 33
Check whether the opening 120 words answer an informational question (what, why, how, when, where, which, who) or include an explicit …
- Very specific: line 35
Verify the page includes at least one <ul>/<ol> or <table> (C03-extractable).
- Very specific: line 37
Check for a visible FAQ section (C04-faq) and ensure it matches FAQPage JSON-LD (S03-faq-parity).
- Distinctive: line 54
Never claim a page is "high quality" or "authoritative" based solely on word count.
- Very specific: line 68
Never fabricate statistics, citations, customer quotes, or research findings when drafting content expansions or answer capsules.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
content-quality — Content Depth & Extractability
1. Description & Activation Criteria
Activate content-quality when the user wants to:
- Evaluate whether a page has sufficient depth (
C01-thin), an answer-first opening (C02-answer), structured lists/tables (C03-extractable,C05-table-headers), FAQ coverage (C04-faq), or semantic HTML landmarks (G11-semantic-content). - Calibrate content checks for specific page types (
--profile blog|product|docs|home). - Improve both human readability and machine extractability for search snippets and AI summaries.
2. Inputs & Prerequisites
- Target: URL, local HTML file, or build directory.
- Profile calibrations (
--profile):default/blog: Thin-content threshold200words (C01-thinP1); checksC02-answer(P1) andC04-faq(P2). Note: the AI Visibilitysubstantivesignal (GEO_WEIGHTS.substantive, +15 pts) requires>=300words across all profiles.product: Thin-content threshold120words; skipsC02-answer(product specs and pricing tables carry the answer).docs: Thin-content threshold200words; elevatesC04-faqandG01-llmstoP1.home: Thin-content threshold100words; skipsC02-answer.
3. Step-by-Step Workflow
- Audit with the matching page-type profile:
- Run
npx one-step-seo page <target> --profile <blog|product|docs|home> --skills content-quality,geo-ai-search --out ./seo-report.
- Run
- Assess content substance (
C01-thin/C01-length/C01-long):- Inspect
report.page.wordCount(computed after stripping<head>,<script>,<style>,<noscript>, and HTML comments). - If
C01-thinfires, identify missing subtopics, specifications, or user questions that should be answered on the page.
- Inspect
- Evaluate answer-first structure (
C02-answer):- Check whether the opening 120 words answer an informational question (
what,why,how,when,where,which,who) or include an explicit summary marker (TL;DR:,In short:,Key takeaway:).
- Check whether the opening 120 words answer an informational question (
- Check structured extractability (
C03-extractable,C05-table-headers,C04-faq):- Verify the page includes at least one
<ul>/<ol>or<table>(C03-extractable). - Confirm every
<table>uses<th>header cells (C05-table-headers) so search engines and LLMs can map cell values to column names. - Check for a visible FAQ section (
C04-faq) and ensure it matchesFAQPageJSON-LD (S03-faq-parity).
- Verify the page includes at least one
- Check semantic document landmarks (
G11-semantic-content):- On articles of 600+ words, confirm prose is wrapped in
<main>or<article>so parsers can isolate primary content from navigation boilerplate.
- On articles of 600+ words, confirm prose is wrapped in
4. Tools & CLI Commands
# Audit an article with the blog profile
npx one-step-seo page https://example.com/blog/guide --profile blog --skills content-quality --out ./seo-report
# Audit documentation pages with stricter FAQ requirements
npx one-step-seo audit https://docs.example.com --pages 10 --profile docs --out ./seo-report5. Evidence Requirements
- Cite
report.page.wordCount, the active--profile, and the exact evidence fromC01,C02,C03,C04,C05, andG11. - Never claim a page is "high quality" or "authoritative" based solely on word count; report structural readiness signals honestly.
6. Expected Outputs
- Content Signal Scorecard: Word count vs profile threshold, answer-first status, list/table count, table
<th>status, FAQ detection, and<main>/<article>landmark presence. - Structural Restructuring Plan: Drafted 40–60 word opening answer block, semantic
<table>with<th>headers, or FAQ section grounded strictly in the page's existing facts.
7. Limitations & External Data
- Automated CLI checks: Word count (body prose only), informational question + answer opening detection,
<ul>/<ol>/<table>counts,<th>header presence, FAQ heading/schema detection, and<main>/<article>landmarks. - Advisory / manual judgment: Factual accuracy, originality, tone of voice, and subject-matter expertise require human editorial review.
8. Safety & Approval Rules
- Never fabricate statistics, citations, customer quotes, or research findings when drafting content expansions or answer capsules. Use explicit
[TODO: insert verified metric]placeholders where user data is needed.
9. Examples
# Check content quality on a product page using the product calibration
npx one-step-seo page https://example.com/shop/item --profile product --skills content-quality --out ./seo-reportDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

