agentleFS
6SNT-RADIO6SNT-RADIO/6SNT-Studio/skills/architecture-decision/SKILL.md

architecture-decision

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

For the Architect (04). Evaluate the stack from the problem (not from familiarity) with 2-3 options per layer, viability criteria, and the ARCHITECTURE.md structure. Use it at the architecture gate.

32 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use team-level, team-narrative and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • CoralGameSkill

    team-level

    Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • CoralGameSkill

    team-narrative

    Orchestrate the narrative team: coordinates narrative-director, writer, world-builder, and level-designer to create cohesive story content, world lore, and narrative-driven level design.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    create-stories

    Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • lilangMaxSkill

    story-done

    End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.

    Also in 9 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    component-release

    Prepares a verifiable Agent Landing Zone UI release. Use for release branches, VERSION, changelog entries, tags, release notes, and compatibility evidence; never publish without explicit human approval.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +7 more from lilangMax

The file

Files
SKILL.md

SKILL: architecture-decision

For: Agent 04 — ARCHITECT

Version: 1.0.0

Core principle

The stack follows the problem. Every technical decision is justified in terms of the problem it solves, not familiarity or preference.

Process

STEP 1 — Understand the problem: product type, user profile, data volume, offline/sync requirements, OS/hardware constraints, available tools (Codex, Claude Code). Do not evaluate technologies until this is complete. STEP 2 — Evaluate 2-3 options per layer with pros/cons in context, not in the abstract. STEP 3 — Check viability: can Codex/Claude Code implement it well? Enough documentation? Manageable dependencies? If not → document it explicitly. STEP 4 — Separate decisions you can make from decisions that need PO approval. STEP 5 — Document what was discarded and why — as important as what was chosen.

Criteria to evaluate a technology

✓ Solves the problem better than the alternatives ✓ Actively maintained, with enough community and documentation ✓ Implementable with the available tools ✓ Scales with expected growth

Warnings: last update over a year ago, sparse docs, dependencies with vulnerabilities, inactive community.

Architectural maintainability

✓ Each module with a clear responsibility ✓ Explicit, minimal dependencies between modules ✓ No critical logic in monolithic files ✓ An AI can modify a module understanding only that module

Tooling context

Claude Chat: does not run code, produces decisions and documentation. Claude Code/Codex: best with modular, well-documented files, struggles with long files (+2000 lines), needs explicit context in AGENTS.md.

ARCHITECTURE.md structure

Stack evaluation → System structure → Folder structure → Technical decisions → Decisions pending approval → Risks → Environment limits

Mistakes to avoid

× Choosing the known stack without evaluating it against the problem × Mixing responsibilities in one module × Not documenting what was discarded × Ignoring expected growth

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.