feature
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Deterministic full-lifecycle feature workflow (engine-driven, gated, looped) — triage → brainstorm → plan → implement → gen-tests → run-tests → lint → review → final-report. Use when the user asks to "add a feature", "build X", "implement Y", "ship a new capability", "new feature X", or wants an end-to-end pass from rough spec to PR-ready implementation with lint and test gates enforced. Worth the ceremony when — the feature is non-trivial (touches multiple files, needs tests, needs a plan), the user wants a structured walk from idea to working code, or wants gated iteration instead of free-form building. Do NOT use for the separate `/feature-dev:feature-dev` plugin — that is an agent-guided collaborative workflow; if the user explicitly invokes that command, respect it. Do NOT use for one-file quick additions (just write the code), bug fixes (use bugfix), or pure refactoring of existing behavior (use refactor). Includes a fast path for trivial changes so the workflow self-adjusts to scale.
72 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- 5hirish/ducttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paulocsb/worldcup-fifa-pooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- vocion/vocion-coretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jisuzzzz/haechitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yicheng47/runnertheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- crbnos/carbontheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use bug, adopt and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
paulocsbSkillbug
Investigation playbook for fixing a bug. Walks through 5 phases: reproduce → isolate → root cause → propose fix → validate. Forces concrete reasoning with code reads, log inspection, and git blame instead of pattern-matching guesses. Use for any non-trivial defect.
Also in 8 projects that use this
codebycoreySkilladopt
Adopt an existing plan from conversation context into delta-spec format. Use when importing a plan, adopting planning that already happened, capturing plan mode output, or bringing in prior design work.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Google CloudSkillfix
Plan a remediation strategy after a test failure.
Also in 10 projects that use this
marylinSkillrecover
Recover work from a crashed or interrupted session. Use when Claude crashed mid-task, after an unexpected exit, when you see 'stale sessions detected', or when you lost context and need to figure out what was happening.
Also in 3 projects that use this
aegiswizardSkillcontext
Also in 4 projects that use this
AWSSkillmap
Map verified service capabilities against customer-provided control framework and threat model. Produces mapping-results.json, controls-catalog.md, and framework-mapping.md. Supports pluggable frameworks: CCMv4, NIST 800-53, CIS Benchmarks, ISO 27001, etc. Split into 4 focused sub-skills for better accuracy; this skill orchestrates them.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Other versions72 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 72
- crbnos/carbon★ 2.8ksame name
- aaronjmars/aeon★ 789same name
- aeonfun/aeon★ 789same name
- astashov/liftosaur★ 775same name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- yicheng47/runner★ 490same name
- bradtraversy/coding-with-ai-course-resources★ 344same name
- garagon/nanostack★ 206same name
- DeL-TaiseiOzaki/claude-code-orchestra★ 199same name
- vide/matedroid★ 86same name
62 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository40 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adrSkill
- auditSkill
- autoloopSkill
- browserSkill
- bugfixSkill
- changelogSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- creating-workflowsSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- doc-genSkill
- dont-reinventSkill
- drySkill
- executingSkill
- gcliSkill
- harness-auditSkill
- healthSkill
- mega-prSkill
- onboardSkill
- pr-readySkill
- refactorSkill
- researchSkill
- scrapeSkill
- scratchpadSkill
- screenshotSkill
- self-auditSkill
- self-improveSkill
- self-lintSkill
- self-migrateSkill
- self-perfSkill
- self-testSkill
- setup-rulesSkill
- stuckSkill
- test-genSkill
- tri-debugSkill
- tri-dispatchSkill
- tri-reviewSkill
- tri-securitySkill
- yagniSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 66 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 12
Use the devkit_start tool with workflow: "feature" and input: "{input}".
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 66 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Feature
Deterministic full-lifecycle feature workflow. Triage → brainstorm → plan → implement → gen-tests → run-tests → lint → review → final-report. Includes a fast path for trivial changes.
Invoke
Use the devkit_start tool with workflow: "feature" and input: "{input}".
Then follow each step the engine returns. Call devkit_advance after completing each step. The engine controls step order, gates, and loops. Do NOT skip steps.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

