compare-video-runs
Skill2 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Compare two local video artifact bundles and surface report-status changes, artifact presence changes, and coarse video-level deltas.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- install-skill-packSkill
- layout-safety-reviewSkill
- package-review-promptSkill
- review-bundleSkill
- segment-evidenceSkill
- segment-storyboardSkill
- skill-catalogSkill
- source-media-signalsSkill
- storyboard-extractSkill
- storyboard-ocrSkill
- storyboard-transitionsSkill
- storyboard-understandSkill
- video-artifact-intakeSkill
- video-shotsSkill
- video-technical-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this when an agent needs a quick regression view across two output bundles.
- Distinctive: line 13
before/after demo runs
- Very specific: line 33
Use left for the baseline or expected-good run and right for the candidate run.
- Very specific: line 44
Run video-artifact-intake first if either side is ambiguous.
- Very specific: line 58
Do not call a run better solely because it has fewer reports or an unknown status.
- Very specific: line 64
If left and right point to the same directory, the comparison will be meaningless.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Compare Video Runs
Use this when an agent needs a quick regression view across two output bundles.
This is best for:
- before/after demo runs
- alternate edit passes
- comparing the latest run against a known-good bundle
Inputs
Provide two bundle locators using the same shape accepted by
video-artifact-intake:
{
"left": {
"outputDir": "./output/baseline-run"
},
"right": {
"outputDir": "./output/current-run"
}
}Use left for the baseline or expected-good run and right for the candidate
run.
Outputs
The result compares normalized bundle maps: overall status changes, artifact presence changes, report status changes, and coarse video metadata deltas when both sides can be probed.
Sequencing Guidance
Run video-artifact-intake first if either side is ambiguous. Use
review-bundle on the candidate side when the comparison finds warnings or
failures. Use storyboard skills on both sides only when visual regressions need
evidence beyond report/status deltas.
Interpretation Notes
The comparison is only as strong as the artifacts present in both bundles. A missing report on the right may indicate a regression in generation, a changed pipeline, or a different output directory. Video duration/resolution deltas are coarse signals; inspect the videos or storyboard frames for behavioral changes.
Abstention Rules
Do not call a run better solely because it has fewer reports or an unknown
status. Abstain from visual regression conclusions unless both runs have
comparable video/storyboard evidence.
Failure Modes
If left and right point to the same directory, the comparison will be
meaningless. Stale latest pointers can compare the wrong run. Missing ffprobe
removes video metadata deltas but should not block artifact comparison.
Repo-side runner:
node --import tsx scripts/harness/compare-bundles.ts
Installed-pack runner:
node ./.video-evaluator/agent/run-tool.mjs compare-video-runs
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

