verify-changes
Skill2 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Verify code or configuration changes with focused tests, static checks, and diff inspection before reporting completion. Use after implementing or modifying a repository; do not use for read-only explanations or when no files changed.
12 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mab-go/xmind-mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- FilenCloudDienste/filen-rstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- vudovn/ag-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- idaholab/moosetheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- foru17/neko-mastertheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- foru17/clash-mastertheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use intelligent-routing, design-spec and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SKB3002Skillintelligent-routing
Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jornalistainclusivoSkilldesign-spec
How to author a DESIGN.md file — the machine-readable design-token + human-rationale format that must exist before any UI is built. YAML front-matter token schema (colors, typography, spacing, rounded, components), type system, token references, and canonical section order.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillbash-linux
Bash/Linux terminal patterns. Critical commands, piping, error handling, scripting. Use when working on macOS or Linux systems.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillred-team-tactics
Red team tactics principles based on MITRE ATT&CK. Attack phases, detection evasion, reporting.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillrust-pro
Master Rust 1.75+ with modern async patterns, advanced type system
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +7 more from xenitV1
Other versions12 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 12
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- foru17/clash-master★ 4.2ksame name
- foru17/neko-master★ 4.2ksame name
- idaholab/moose★ 2.4ksame name
- h0x91b/dev-3.0★ 329same name
- FilenCloudDienste/filen-rs★ 104same name
- mab-go/xmind-mcp★ 9same name
- zzfancitizen/agent-skills-self-learning-sample★ 3same name
- gillkyle/skills★ 1same name
2 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository43 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- accessibility-auditSkill
- ai-feature-reviewSkill
- api-design-reviewSkill
- architecture-reviewSkill
- cli-and-scripts-auditSkill
- coding-styleSkill
- data-auditSkill
- data-minimizationSkill
- debugSkill
- describe-changesSkill
- destructive-ops-approvalSkill
- docs-consolidationSkill
- explain-codebaseSkill
- full-project-auditSkill
- implement-featureSkill
- improve-promptSkill
- incident-responseSkill
- infrastructure-auditSkill
- legal-compliance-reviewSkill
- license-complianceSkill
- no-ai-tracesSkill
- operations-auditSkill
- performance-auditSkill
- prepare-releaseSkill
- production-readiness-reviewSkill
- refactorSkill
- repository-auditSkill
- review-codeSkill
- secret-hygieneSkill
- security-auditSkill
- simplify-codeSkill
- start-projectSkill
- supply-chain-pinningSkill
- surgical-implementationSkill
- threat-modelSkill
- upgrade-dependenciesSkill
- ux-reviewSkill
- write-agent-instructionsSkill
- write-docsSkill
- write-testsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 10 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 9
Verify the actual change at the narrowest useful scope, then expand checks in proportion to risk.
- Distinctive: line 15
Run the smallest focused test that exercises each changed behavior.
- Distinctive: line 16
Run the relevant formatter, linter, type checker, build, or broader test suite when the change can affect adjacent code.
- Distinctive: line 23
Do not claim success without fresh evidence from the current working tree.
- Distinctive: line 24
Do not hide failing checks because they appear unrelated.
- Distinctive: line 25
Do not broaden the change merely to make unrelated checks pass.
- Distinctive: line 26
Never expose credentials or sensitive output in logs or the final report.
- Distinctive: line 27
Treat skipped checks as residual risk, not as passing checks.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 10 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verify Changes
Verify the actual change at the narrowest useful scope, then expand checks in proportion to risk.
Workflow
- Inspect the final diff and list the behaviors that changed.
- Identify the repository's documented validation commands before inventing new ones.
- Run the smallest focused test that exercises each changed behavior.
- Run the relevant formatter, linter, type checker, build, or broader test suite when the change can affect adjacent code.
- Inspect generated files and user-visible output when automated assertions cannot cover layout or behavior.
- Re-read the diff for accidental edits, debug output, secrets, stale comments, and missing tests.
- Report which checks ran, their outcomes, and any check that could not run.
Rules
- Do not claim success without fresh evidence from the current working tree.
- Do not hide failing checks because they appear unrelated. Distinguish pre-existing failures only when evidence supports that conclusion.
- Do not broaden the change merely to make unrelated checks pass.
- Never expose credentials or sensitive output in logs or the final report.
- Treat skipped checks as residual risk, not as passing checks.
Completion evidence
Provide a concise summary containing:
- focused checks and their results;
- broader checks and their results, when applicable;
- manual inspection performed, when applicable;
- remaining limitations or unverified behavior.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

