simmer
CLAUDE.md16 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Simmer is an iterative refinement skill. It takes any artifact — a single file, a workspace of multiple files, a pipeline, a configuration — and hones it repeatedly against user-defined criteria. Evaluation can be subjective (judge-based), objective (runnable script), or hybrid (both). Context discipline: Generator doesn't see scores (avoids optimizing for numbers). Judge doesn't see intermediate scores (avoids anchoring). Reflect is the only subskill that sees the full trajectory. Seed calibration: Judge receives the seed artifact + iteration-0 scores on…
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- simmer-generatorSkill
- simmer-judge-boardSkill
- simmer-judgeSkill
- simmer-reflectSkill
- simmer-setupSkill
- simmerSkill
The file
Files
Simmer Plugin
Overview
Simmer is an iterative refinement skill. It takes any artifact — a single file, a workspace of multiple files, a pipeline, a configuration — and hones it repeatedly against user-defined criteria. Evaluation can be subjective (judge-based), objective (runnable script), or hybrid (both).
Skills Included
| Skill | Triggers | Description |
simmer | "simmer this", "refine this", "hone this", "iterate on this", "optimize this pipeline" | Orchestrator: setup → loop → output |
Subskills (invoked by orchestrator)
| Subskill | Role |
simmer:simmer-setup | Identify artifact (file or workspace), elicit criteria, determine evaluation method, produce setup brief |
simmer:simmer-generator | Produce improved candidate from current + ASI feedback + background context |
simmer:simmer-judge | Score candidate 1-10 per criterion (with optional evaluator output), produce ASI |
simmer:simmer-judge-board | Multi-judge panel with deliberation — drop-in replacement for simmer-judge when JUDGE_MODE is board |
simmer:simmer-reflect | Record trajectory, track best-so-far, pass ASI forward |
Flow
"Simmer this" / "Refine this" / "Optimize this pipeline"
↓
Setup (identify artifact + criteria + evaluation method)
↓
Iteration 0: Evaluate the seed
↓
Loop N times:
Generate (address ASI) → Evaluate (run evaluator if present) → Judge (score + new ASI) → Reflect (record)
↓
Output best candidate + trajectoryKey Design Decisions
Context discipline: Generator doesn't see scores (avoids optimizing for numbers). Judge doesn't see intermediate scores (avoids anchoring). Reflect is the only subskill that sees the full trajectory.
Seed calibration: Judge receives the seed artifact + iteration-0 scores on every iteration as a fixed calibration reference. Can score above or below the seed. This compresses score variance across runs.
ASI (Actionable Side Information): Judge identifies the highest-leverage direction each round. For single-file targets, this is a single focused fix. For workspace targets, this is a single strategic direction that may involve coordinated changes across multiple files. Focused directional improvement compounds better than scattered edits.
Pluggable evaluation: Three modes — judge-only (default, subjective criteria), runnable (script/command output), or hybrid (both). No format contract on evaluator output — the judge interprets whatever the evaluator produces.
Regression handling: Reflect tracks best-so-far. If an iteration regresses, next generator receives the best candidate, not the regressed one. In workspace mode, this means git checkout to the best iteration's commit.
Judge board: For complex artifacts, the board constructs problem-specific judges that investigate before scoring — reading the evaluator script, ground truth, prior candidates, and config to understand the problem before proposing improvements. Judges are composed once per run, tailored to the specific problem, then reuse for all iterations with updated context. Tracks stable wins (WORKING/NOT WORKING) across iterations to prevent undoing proven improvements.
Artifact Modes
| Mode | Artifact Type | Tracking |
| Single-file (default) | One file or pasted text | iteration-N-candidate.md files |
| Workspace | Directory with multiple files | Git commits per iteration |
Evaluation Modes
| Mode | When to use | How it works |
| Judge-only (default) | Text artifacts, design docs, creative writing | Judge scores against criteria descriptions |
| Runnable | Code, pipelines, configs with test suites | Judge runs command, interprets output alongside criteria |
| Hybrid | Pipelines with both metrics and subjective quality | Judge runs command AND scores output against criteria |
Related Skills
Simmer is part of the test-kitchen family but independently installable:
test-kitchen:omakase-off— parallel design explorationtest-kitchen:cookoff— parallel implementation competitionsimmer— iterative refinement of any artifact or workspace
Directory Structure
simmer/
.claude-plugin/
plugin.json
skills/
simmer/
SKILL.md # Orchestrator
simmer-setup/
SKILL.md # Identify artifact + elicit criteria + evaluation method
simmer-generator/
SKILL.md # Produce improved candidate
simmer-judge/
SKILL.md # Score + produce ASI (with optional evaluator output)
simmer-judge-board/
SKILL.md # Multi-judge panel with deliberation
simmer-reflect/
SKILL.md # Record trajectory + track best
docs/
specs/
2026-03-16-simmer-v2-design.md
tests/
integration/
simmer-scenario.md # Integration test scenarios
CLAUDE.md
README.mdArtifact Output
Single-file mode:
{OUTPUT_DIR}/ # Default: docs/simmer
iteration-0-candidate.md # Seed
iteration-1-candidate.md # Each improved candidate
iteration-2-candidate.md
iteration-3-candidate.md
trajectory.md # Running score table
result.md # Final best outputWorkspace mode:
{WORKSPACE}/ # The target directory (modified in place)
[project files] # Tracked via git commits per iteration
{OUTPUT_DIR}/
trajectory.md # Running score tableDoes it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

