meta-ads-audit
Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Full Meta Ads account audit based on Sam Tomlinson's 75-point framework. Use when user asks to audit Meta Ads, Facebook Ads audit, check Meta account health, what's wrong with my Meta Ads, or full Meta review. Also trigger for "Meta account problems", "FB ads not working", "diagnose Meta Ads", or "why are my Facebook ads failing".
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- nowork-studio/notfair-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 14, 2026
- gomarble-ai/marketing-agenttheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- nowork-studio/topranktheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- bartlomiejborzucki/meta-ads-agenttheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
- gmmh1/claude-paid-media-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 19, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use meta-ads-creative.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
bartlomiejborzuckiSkillmeta-ads-creative
Generate genuinely different creative angles, hooks, primary text, headlines, descriptions, and CTAs for Meta (Facebook/Instagram) ads, constrained by the brand's voice, banned phrases, and claims policy. Use for "write me three angles", "new ad copy", "variations on the winning ad", "creative concepts for this offer", or when a campaign build needs copy.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills★ 6.5ksame name
- nowork-studio/toprank★ 4.1ksame name
- nowork-studio/notfair-plugin★ 4.1ksame name
- gomarble-ai/marketing-agent★ 15same name
- bartlomiejborzucki/meta-ads-agent★ 0same name
- gmmh1/claude-paid-media-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- agency-account-auditSkill
- agency-budget-optimizerSkill
- agency-client-reportSkill
- agency-search-term-optimizerSkill
- agency-weekly-reviewSkill
- cross-channel-budget-optimizerSkill
- google-ads-auditSkill
- google-ads-bidding-strategistSkill
- google-ads-campaign-builderSkill
- google-ads-keyword-researcherSkill
- meta-ads-audience-strategistSkill
- meta-ads-budget-allocatorSkill
- meta-ads-creative-auditorSkill
- meta-ads-scaling-playbookSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Before looking at ads, understand the business:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Meta Ads Account Audit — Sam Tomlinson's Framework
You audit Meta Ads accounts using a systematic 7-phase framework based on Sam Tomlinson's 75-point audit methodology, adapted for the Advantage+ era of 2026.
Pull All Data First
get_meta_ads_metrics: account level, 30 days with compareget_meta_ads_metrics: campaign level, 30 daysget_meta_ads_metrics: ad set level, 30 days — check frequency, audience sizes- Cross-reference with GA4 for attribution reality check
Phase 1: Business Foundation (Gate)
Before looking at ads, understand the business:
- What's the product/service?
- What's the target CPA/ROAS?
- Who's the ideal customer?
- What's the average order value / customer LTV?
If no conversion goal is defined → flag as critical. Can't optimize without a target.
Phase 2: Tracking Integrity (Weight: Critical Gate)
| Check | Good | Problem |
| Meta Pixel installed | Firing on all pages | Missing or partial |
| Conversions API (CAPI) | Server-side events matching pixel | No CAPI = losing 20-30% of data |
| Event Match Quality (EMQ) | >6.0 | <4.0 is unreliable |
| Conversion events defined | Purchase/Lead as primary | Page view as conversion |
| GA4 cross-check | Meta and GA4 within 30% | >50% discrepancy |
| iOS tracking opt-in rate | Tracked | Unknown |
Score: If tracking is broken, cap overall audit at 20/100
Phase 3: Account Structure (Weight: 20%)
| Check | 2026 Best Practice | Red Flag |
| Campaign count | 2-5 focused campaigns | 15+ campaigns competing |
| Campaign type | ASC for scaling, manual for testing | Everything in manual |
| Prospecting/retargeting split | Separate campaigns | Mixed in same campaign |
| Ad set count per campaign | 3-5 | 20+ ad sets competing |
| Creatives per ad set/ASC | 20-50 in ASC | <5 creatives |
| Naming convention | Systematic | Random/inconsistent |
Phase 4: Creative Assessment (Weight: 25%)
| Check | Healthy | Problem |
| Active creative count | 20+ across account | <5 |
| Creative refresh cadence | New creatives every 2-3 weeks | Same ads for months |
| Format diversity | Mix of image, video, carousel, reel | Single format only |
| Creative testing active | Dedicated testing budget (30%) | No testing |
| Average creative age | <21 days | >30 days |
| CTR trend | Stable or improving | Declining 3+ weeks |
| Hook quality (video) | ThruPlay >15% | ThruPlay <10% |
Remember: Creative is 70-80% of Meta performance. This is the most important phase.
Phase 5: Audience & Targeting (Weight: 15%)
| Check | 2026 Reality | Issue |
| Targeting approach | Broad + Advantage+ | Over-targeted interests |
| Custom audiences active | CRM, pixel, engagement | No first-party data |
| Audience size | >1M for prospecting | <100K (too narrow) |
| Audience overlap | <20% between ad sets | >30% overlap = competing |
| Customer exclusions | Exclude buyers from prospecting | Not excluding |
| Frequency management | <2.5 cold, <5.0 retargeting | >4.0 cold |
Phase 6: Performance Optimization (Weight: 25%)
| Check | Benchmark | Issue |
| CTR (link click) | >1.5% | <0.8% |
| CPA | At/below target | >1.5x target |
| ROAS (ecom) | >3.0x | <2.0x |
| CPM trends | Stable | Rising 15%+ MoM |
| Budget utilization | 80-100% | <50% (underspend) |
| Learning phase | Exited | Stuck in learning |
| Device performance | Checked | Mobile/desktop gap >3x |
| Placement performance | Checked | Audience Network >2x CPA |
Phase 7: Competitive & Strategic (Weight: 15%)
| Check | Good | Gap |
| Ad Library review | Know competitor creative | Never checked |
| Offer competitiveness | Clear USP in ads | Generic messaging |
| Landing page experience | Fast, matches ad promise | Slow, disconnected |
| Seasonal planning | Calendar of key dates | Reactive, not proactive |
Country-specific seasonality:
- Brazil: Black Friday, Dia dos Namorados (June 12), Carnaval
- UAE: Ramadan (+40-60% costs), Dubai Shopping Festival, Eid
- South Africa: Black Friday (biggest e-commerce day), year-end holidays
- India: Diwali ($6-7B), Navratri, Republic Day sales
Scoring
Overall = (Phase3 × 0.20) + (Phase4 × 0.25) + (Phase5 × 0.15) + (Phase6 × 0.25) + (Phase7 × 0.15)
If Phase 2 (Tracking) fails: Overall capped at 20/100Output Format
## Meta Ads Account Audit
### Overall Health Score: [X]/100
### Phase Scores
| Phase | Score | Weight | Status |
|-------|-------|--------|--------|
| Tracking Integrity | PASS/FAIL | Gate | |
| Account Structure | X/100 | 20% | |
| Creative Assessment | X/100 | 25% | |
| Audience & Targeting | X/100 | 15% | |
| Performance | X/100 | 25% | |
| Competitive/Strategic | X/100 | 15% | |
### Critical Issues (fix this week)
1. [Issue with data] — impact: $X/month wasted
2. ...
### Strategic Opportunities
1. [Opportunity] — potential: $X/month in additional conversions
2. ...
### 30-Day Improvement Plan
Week 1: [Tracking & structure fixes]
Week 2: [Creative refresh]
Week 3: [Audience optimization]
Week 4: [Scaling what works]Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

