agentleFS
1337hero1337hero/faster-chat/.claude/skill/insecure-defaults/SKILL.md

insecure-defaults

Skill175 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Detects fail-open insecure defaults (hardcoded secrets, weak auth, permissive security) that allow apps to run insecurely in production. Use when auditing security, reviewing config management, or analyzing environment variable handling.

  • Reads credentials

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Do not use this skill for:

    line 27
  2. Common:

    When in doubt: trace the code path to determine if the app runs with the default or crashes.

    line 35
  3. Common:

    Follow this workflow for every potential finding:

    line 47
  4. Very specific:

    Search for patterns in /config/, /auth/, /database/, and env files:

    line 54
  5. Common:

    When is this code executed?

    line 68
  6. Common:

    If production config provides the variable → Lower severity (but still a code-level vulnerability) If production config missing or uses …

    line 75
  7. Common:

    If production config missing or uses default → CRITICAL

    line 76

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Insecure Defaults Detection

Finds fail-open vulnerabilities where apps run insecurely with missing configuration. Distinguishes exploitable defaults from fail-secure patterns that crash safely.

  • Fail-open (CRITICAL): SECRET = env.get('KEY') or 'default' → App runs with weak secret
  • Fail-secure (SAFE): SECRET = env['KEY'] → App crashes if missing

When to Use

  • Security audits of production applications (auth, crypto, API security)
  • Configuration review of deployment files, IaC templates, Docker configs
  • Code review of environment variable handling and secrets management
  • Pre-deployment checks for hardcoded credentials or weak defaults

When NOT to Use

Do not use this skill for:

  • Test fixtures explicitly scoped to test environments (files in test/, spec/, __tests__/)
  • Example/template files (.example, .template, .sample suffixes)
  • Development-only tools (local Docker Compose for dev, debug scripts)
  • Documentation examples in README.md or docs/ directories
  • Build-time configuration that gets replaced during deployment
  • Crash-on-missing behavior where app won't start without proper config (fail-secure)

When in doubt: trace the code path to determine if the app runs with the default or crashes.

Rationalizations to Reject

  • "It's just a development default" → If it reaches production code, it's a finding
  • "The production config overrides it" → Verify prod config exists; code-level vulnerability remains if not
  • "This would never run without proper config" → Prove it with code trace; many apps fail silently
  • "It's behind authentication" → Defense in depth; compromised session still exploits weak defaults
  • "We'll fix it before release" → Document now; "later" rarely comes

Workflow

Follow this workflow for every potential finding:

1. SEARCH: Perform Project Discovery and Find Insecure Defaults

Determine language, framework, and project conventions. Use this information to further discover things like secret storage locations, secret usage patterns, credentialed third-party integrations, cryptography, and any other relevant configuration. Further use information to analyze insecure default configurations.

Example Search for patterns in **/config/, **/auth/, **/database/, and env files:

  • Fallback secrets: getenv.*\) or ['"], process\.env\.[A-Z_]+ \|\| ['"], ENV\.fetch.*default:
  • Hardcoded credentials: password.*=.*['"][^'"]{8,}['"], api[_-]?key.*=.*['"][^'"]+['"]
  • Weak defaults: DEBUG.*=.*true, AUTH.*=.*false, CORS.*=.*\*
  • Crypto algorithms: MD5|SHA1|DES|RC4|ECB in security contexts

Tailor search approach based on discovery results.

Focus on production-reachable code, not test fixtures or example files.

2. VERIFY: Actual Behavior

For each match, trace the code path to understand runtime behavior.

Questions to answer:

  • When is this code executed? (Startup vs. runtime)
  • What happens if a configuration variable is missing?
  • Is there validation that enforces secure configuration?

3. CONFIRM: Production Impact

Determine if this issue reaches production:

If production config provides the variable → Lower severity (but still a code-level vulnerability) If production config missing or uses default → CRITICAL

4. REPORT: with Evidence

Example report:

Finding: Hardcoded JWT Secret Fallback
Location: src/auth/jwt.ts:15
Pattern: const secret = process.env.JWT_SECRET || 'default';

Verification: App starts without JWT_SECRET; secret used in jwt.sign() at line 42
Production Impact: Dockerfile missing JWT_SECRET
Exploitation: Attacker forges JWTs using 'default', gains unauthorized access

Quick Verification Checklist

Fallback Secrets: SECRET = env.get(X) or Y → Verify: App starts without env var? Secret used in crypto/auth? → Skip: Test fixtures, example files

Default Credentials: Hardcoded username/password pairs → Verify: Active in deployed config? No runtime override? → Skip: Disabled accounts, documentation examples

Fail-Open Security: AUTH_REQUIRED = env.get(X, 'false') → Verify: Default is insecure (false/disabled/permissive)? → Safe: App crashes or default is secure (true/enabled/restricted)

Weak Crypto: MD5/SHA1/DES/RC4/ECB in security contexts → Verify: Used for passwords, encryption, or tokens? → Skip: Checksums, non-security hashing

Permissive Access: CORS *, permissions 0777, public-by-default → Verify: Default allows unauthorized access? → Skip: Explicitly configured permissiveness with justification

Debug Features: Stack traces, introspection, verbose errors → Verify: Enabled by default? Exposed in responses? → Skip: Logging-only, not user-facing

For detailed examples and counter-examples, see examples.md.

Download now (ZIP)

  • Other versions8 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 4

    1. ratsark/Clarmory★ 2100% same
    2. allanninal/claude-code-skills★ 1100% same
    3. Getampz/Skills★ 0100% same
    4. TheWatcher01/skills★ 0100% same

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use supply-chain-risk-auditor and second-opinion.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • TheWatcher01Skill

      supply-chain-risk-auditor

      Identifies dependencies at heightened risk of exploitation or takeover. Use when assessing supply chain attack surface, evaluating dependency health, or scoping security engagements.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • MicrosoftSkill

      second-opinion

      Independent review of current work or a past session. USE WHEN a user wants a second opinion. DO NOT USE WHEN ordinary code review is wanted — use code-review.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

  • In this repository5 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.