release
Skill1.2k starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Cut a Peekaping release: check main and the changelog, dispatch the Release workflow, watch it, verify the tag, release notes and images, then open the follow-up PR. Also builds release candidates (X.Y.Z-rc.N).
196 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
More talk lately.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- zxcvbn-ts/zxcvbntheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- TechbeeAT/jtxBoardtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- ddnexus/pagytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- zerx-lab/FluxDowntheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- orioledb/orioledbtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- AmruthPillai/Reactive-Resumetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Who's talking about 0xfurai/peekaping
- A Hacker News story“peekaping: selfhosted uptime monitoring similar to UptimeKuma (Go/React)”Hacker News · Sep 8, 2025 · 4 points
- ProSkillsMD/proskills“[Candidate] 0xfurai/peekaping/.agents/skills/ticket-review - ticket-review”GitHub · Oct 26, 2026
The biggest 2 of 2 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Used with
Projects with it also use create-agent-adapter, changelog-style and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MicrosoftSkillcreate-agent-adapter
Technical guide for creating a new Paperclip agent adapter. Use when building a new adapter package, adding support for a new AI coding tool (e.g. a new CLI agent, API-based agent, or custom process), or when modifying the adapter system. Covers the required interfaces, module structure, registration points, and conventions derived from the existing claude-local and codex-local adapters.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GrinvSkillchangelog-style
Turn a commit range into CHANGELOG.md entries following common-changelog style. Use when finishing a PR or cutting a release, to write/fix the [Unreleased] section's entries — moving [Unreleased] under a new dated version heading is a separate, automated step (see the release skill / scripts/sync-version.ts), not this skill's job.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GrinvSkilldocs-consistency-check
Check README/manifest.json/server.json/CHANGELOG.md/AGENTS.md and docs/*.md for drift against the actual registered tools and source. Use after adding, renaming, or removing a tool, or as part of a live-audit pass.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillcomponent-release
Prepares a verifiable Agent Landing Zone UI release. Use for release branches, VERSION, changelog entries, tags, release notes, and compatibility evidence; never publish without explicit human approval.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilldocumentation-consistency
Keeps AI Landing Zone contributor, user, and operator documentation aligned with shipped Bicep behavior. Use for parameters, defaults, outputs, topology, deployment flow, operations, or releases.
Also in 8 projects that use this
rivet-devSkilllaunch-graphics
Generate agentOS marketing/launch graphics (launch & social heroes, code-snippet cards) from the committed generators in docs-internal/graphics. Use when asked to make, update, or render an agentOS launch image, social image, "agentOS Apps" graphic, or technical code-snippet image.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Grinv
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 196
- paperclipai/paperclip★ 112ksame name
- modelcontextprotocol/servers★ 92ksame name
- remotion-dev/remotion★ 72ksame name
- traefik/traefik★ 65ksame name
- usememos/memos★ 64ksame name
- tw93/Pake★ 63ksame name
- AmruthPillai/Reactive-Resume★ 45ksame name
- amruthpillai/reactive-resume★ 45ksame name
- reactive-resume/reactive-resume★ 45ksame name
- Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claude-sisyphus★ 41ksame name
186 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ticket-buildSkill
- ticket-loopSkill
- ticket-planSkill
- ticket-prSkill
- ticket-reviewSkill
- ticketSkill
- treehouseSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Never pass the workflow's changelog input.
- Distinctive: line 45
Every migration listed should have an entry that says what it does to an existing database.
- Very specific: line 55
Only when step 2 found gaps.
- Very specific: line 59
Keep only the ### headings.
- Distinctive: line 87
Don't report the release out until each of these is checked:
- Distinctive: line 116
Ask which branch to build: main, or the branch of a PR the user wants to try.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Release
The Release workflow (.github/workflows/docker-release.yml) is started by hand with a version. In 15 to 40 minutes it:
- builds every image for amd64 and arm64 and pushes them to GHCR and Docker Hub;
- merges the multi-arch manifests (and
latest) and runs the e2e suite against the pushed images; - bumps
version.go,package.jsonandversion.ts, moves[Unreleased]inCHANGELOG.mdunder the new version, and pushes that commit straight tomain; - creates the GitHub Release, with its tag on that commit;
- pushes the Helm chart to
oci://ghcr.io/0xfurai/charts/peekaping, withversionandappVersionset to the release, so it installs that release's images; - deploys the demo.
It runs no unit tests, and none of it can be taken back cleanly: the images and the release are public and the commit is on main. So the work is in the steps before the dispatch.
Rules
- The user decides. You prepare, check, and dispatch only after their explicit go-ahead on the exact version.
- Never pass the workflow's
changeloginput. It is pasted into a shell script, and the entries are full of backticks, which the shell would run. Left empty, the workflow reads[Unreleased]itself. - From the dispatch until the GitHub Release exists, nothing merges into
main. The bump job pushes tomainafter the e2e suite, from the commit the run started on, and fails ifmainmoved since; a merge after that lands in the tag, because the release job cuts the tag at the head ofmain. - Tags have no
vprefix:0.0.47. - Other sessions share the main checkout. Files change in a worktree under
.claude/worktrees/;git fetch, never switch branches in the main checkout.
1. Choose the version
Take it from the argument. With none, propose the next patch after the last tag (git tag -l | sort -V): every release so far is 0.0.N. An X.Y.Z-rc.N version goes to release candidates.
2. Preflight
From the repo root (or any worktree of it):
.agents/skills/release/scripts/preflight.sh <X.Y.Z>It reads origin/main and reports: the version is new, CI on main, the [Unreleased] entries, PRs merged since the last tag that no entry mentions, migrations added since, and whether the Helm chart's bundled PostgreSQL and Redis are behind the latest. BLOCK lines exit 1.
- A red or still-running CI is a blocker: the release workflow won't catch what
Test and LintandPlaywright Testscatch. - The PR list is a worklist, not a verdict. Entries cite PR numbers, issue numbers or nothing, so read the entries for each PR on it. Tests, CI and refactors with no visible change need no entry.
- Every migration listed should have an entry that says what it does to an existing database.
- A
WARN Helm chart:line never blocks. It says one of three things:... are behind the latest: Bitnami has published newer PostgreSQL or Redis subcharts or images than the chart pins. Runscripts/update-chart-deps.sh --writein a PR, before the release or after it.... has a new major version: a subchart or an image has another major version than the chart pins.--writerefuses it and writes nothing, not even for the lines that are only behind, because Bitnami's major versions are breaking. It is a ticket of its own: tell the user, and don't run--write.couldn't check ..., ororigin/main has no scripts/update-chart-deps.sh: nothing is known to be behind. Tools (helm, curl, jq), files onorigin/mainor access to Docker Hub are missing. Fix that and run the preflight again, or runscripts/update-chart-deps.shby hand to see its report.--writeis not the next step.
Done when: no blockers, and every PR on the list has an entry or a reason not to.
3. Curate the changelog
Only when step 2 found gaps. In a worktree (git worktree add .claude/worktrees/release-<X.Y.Z> -b chore/release-<X.Y.Z>-changelog origin/main), edit [Unreleased] in CHANGELOG.md:
- One entry per user-visible change, under Added, Changed or Fixed, in the style of its neighbours:
type: what the user sees now (#issue, #pr) (thanks @author). Read the PR (gh pr view <n>) for what changed; credit authors the way the neighbouring entries do. - A change that needs the user to act on upgrade, such as a migration, a new default or a moved setting, says so in the entry, starting
Upgrade note:. - Keep only the
###headings. The workflow copies[Unreleased]withawk, which drops every other line that starts with#.
Open one PR as in STACK.md, without a ticket key: docs: complete the changelog for <X.Y.Z>. The user merges it. Then run the preflight again.
4. Get the go-ahead
Ask with the brief in PLAN.md, one AskUserQuestion: dispatch <X.Y.Z> or wait. The brief gives the version and the last tag, the origin/main commit, what [Unreleased] says in a few plain lines, the upgrade notes and migrations, and anything the preflight flagged and how it settled. Ask the user not to merge into main until you report the release is out.
Done when: the user said to dispatch that version. If origin/main moved since you asked, run the preflight again and re-confirm.
5. Dispatch
gh workflow run docker-release.yml --ref main -f version=<X.Y.Z>
gh run list --workflow=docker-release.yml --limit 1 --json databaseId,headSha,statusThe run takes a few seconds to appear. Check that its headSha is the commit the user approved. Then watch with gh run watch <id> --exit-status as a Bash run_in_background; its exit wakes you. The jobs run in this order: build-images and build-single-image (both per architecture), create-manifest, playwright-tests, bump-version, release, then publish-chart and deploy-demo side by side.
6. If the run fails
Find the cause: gh run view <id> --log-failed. Then see whether the bump landed: git fetch origin && git log origin/main --author=github-actions -3 --format='%h %s', looking for chore: bump version to <X.Y.Z> and update changelog.
- No bump commit.
mainis untouched, but oncecreate-manifesthas passed the version tags andlatestare public. A flake or an outage gets onegh run rerun <id> --failed, which reruns the failed jobs and the ones after them on the same commit. A real failure stops here: tell the user the cause. The fix is a normal PR; then preflight and dispatch the same version again, which overwrites the manifests (nothing rolled[Unreleased]). Ifbump-versionfailed becausemainmoved, a rerun fails the same way, since the job starts from the commit the run started on; dispatch again from the new head, after the go-ahead of step 4. - Bump commit on
main. Onlyrelease,publish-chartanddeploy-demorun after it. Never dispatch the same version again: the changelog step would roll an empty[Unreleased]into a second## [<X.Y.Z>]heading. A flake gets onegh run rerun <id> --failed. A real failure goes to the user with the brief in PLAN.md: the images and the rolled changelog exist, the release doesn't, and the way out is to fix forward and release the next patch.
7. Verify
Don't report the release out until each of these is checked:
- Run.
gh run view <id>shows success.deploy-demodoesn't count: its deploy step iscontinue-on-error, so a failure shows only as a "Demo not updated" warning on the run. Read that job's log: it prints the demo'simage:lines, which should end in<X.Y.Z>. - Main.
git log origin/main --author=github-actions -1is the bump commit.git show origin/main:CHANGELOG.md | head -30shows an empty[Unreleased]and## [<X.Y.Z>] - <today>under it. - Tag and release.
gh release view <X.Y.Z> --json tagName,isPrerelease,url,body: not a pre-release, the body starts with the notes you reviewed.git rev-parse <X.Y.Z>^{commit}is the bump commit; if not, say which commits landed after it. - Images. For each of
web api migrate probe,docker buildx imagetools inspect 0xfurai/peekaping-<name>:<X.Y.Z>listslinux/amd64andlinux/arm64. The single-mode image has no suffix: the same check on0xfurai/peekaping:<X.Y.Z>. (peekaping-bundle-postgresgets no new tags: its last is 0.0.47.) For one of them,--format '{{.Manifest.Digest}}'is the same for:<X.Y.Z>and:latest. Through 0.1.0, the old name0xfurai/peekaping-bundle-sqlitegets the same tags, so also check that its--format '{{.Manifest.Digest}}'equals the one of0xfurai/peekapingat both<X.Y.Z>andlatest. After 0.1.0 the old name gets no tags, so skip this (PP-321). This checks Docker Hub; GHCR pushes come from the same greencreate-manifestjob, and an anonymous inspect of GHCR can answer 403. - Helm chart.
helm show chart oci://ghcr.io/0xfurai/charts/peekaping --version <X.Y.Z>showsversionandappVersionof<X.Y.Z>. After the first release that publishes it, the GHCR packagecharts/peekapingis private: in its package settings on GitHub, link it to the repository and make it public, or the command answers 401 for everyone else. - First release with the new image name (0.0.48), one-time steps. These are manual, because a new GHCR package starts private and the workflow can't change that:
- After the first push of
peekaping(an RC or the release, whichever comes first): in the settings of the GHCR packagepeekapingon GitHub, link it to the repository and make it public. Until then an anonymousdocker pull ghcr.io/0xfurai/peekaping:<version>(the RC or release version: an RC pushes nolatest) answers 401 or 403. The e2e job logs in, so the release itself doesn't need it. Check on Docker Hub that the repository0xfurai/peekapingis public and has a description. - After the release: on the demo host, change the
image:line in the compose file to0xfurai/peekaping:<X.Y.Z>.deploy-demo.ymlonly seds the tag, so it keeps the old name until you do. Update the RepoCloud template to the new image name. Point the Docker Hub and GHCR descriptions ofpeekaping-bundle-sqliteatpeekaping. - The old name
peekaping-bundle-sqlitegets tags through 0.1.0. After it, the follow-up ticket removes its lines fromdocker-release.yml(each carries a comment with PP-321) and this check.
- After the first push of
8. Open the OpenAPI PR
A known gap in the workflow: the bump changes the API's version, which is written into apps/server/docs/openapi.json and openapi.yaml, but the workflow doesn't regenerate them, and its push starts no CI. The first PR that touches apps/server or apps/web then fails bun run api:check.
In a worktree off the updated origin/main, run bun run api:generate. The diff should be the version line in those two files and nothing else. If go doesn't run on this machine, change that one line in each file by hand; CI's api:check confirms it. Commit chore(server): regenerate the OpenAPI docs for <X.Y.Z>, open the PR as in STACK.md without a ticket key, and give the user the link: it should merge before any other PR. Delete this step when the workflow regenerates the docs itself.
9. Wrap up
Tell the user: the release URL, the run URL, what you verified, anything to look at (the demo, an upgrade note), and the OpenAPI PR. Remove the release worktrees once their PRs merge: git worktree remove .claude/worktrees/release-<X.Y.Z>.
Done when: the GitHub Release is out with the right notes, both architectures are on Docker Hub, main has the bump, and the OpenAPI PR is open.
Release candidates
X.Y.Z-rc.N runs release-candidate.yml. It runs the web lint and build and the server tests first, pushes every image tagged with the RC version only (never latest), the single-mode image as peekaping and not under the old name, and publishes a pre-release at the head of the branch it ran on. It leaves CHANGELOG.md and the version files alone, so the preflight and changelog steps (2, 3), the bump case of step 6 and step 8 don't apply.
- Next number:
git tag -l 'X.Y.Z-rc.*' | sort -V | tail -1, plus one;rc.1for the first. - Ask which branch to build:
main, or the branch of a PR the user wants to try. The RC is public, so get the go-ahead on the version and branch, as in step 4. gh workflow run release-candidate.yml --ref <branch> -f version=<X.Y.Z-rc.N>, with nochangeloginput, then watch as in step 5.- Verify as in step 7: the run,
gh release viewshows a pre-release, and the images carry both architectures. On a PR branch the workflow comments the images on the PR. The RC that first pushespeekapingcreates its GHCR package: do the one-time steps for the new image name from step 7 now, so the package is public before the release.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

