agentleFS
0xelitesystem0xelitesystem/claude-skills-collection/skills/meeting-notes-summarizer/SKILL.md

meeting-notes-summarizer

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user provides a meeting transcript, recording transcript, or raw meeting notes and wants a structured summary. Triggers on "summarize this meeting", "extract action items from this transcript", "what did we decide in this call", "TL;DR this Zoom recording", or when the user pastes a transcript longer than ~500 words from a meeting context.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the entire input first: Don't summarize as you go.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    If something was raised but not decided, put it in "Open questions" instead.

    line 26
  3. Distinctive:

    If the owner wasn't named, write "[unowned]" so it's obvious.

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    If the transcript clearly contains sensitive info (compensation discussions, performance reviews of named individuals, legal disputes), …

    line 59
  5. Distinctive:

    Transcript with low-quality auto-transcription: if you see frequent garbled phrases ("the [unintelligible] is going to [unintelligible]"), …

    line 63
  6. Distinctive:

    Transcript with multiple meetings concatenated: ask whether to summarize each separately or combine.

    line 64

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Meeting Notes Summarizer

Turn raw transcript into a structured, scannable summary.

Process

  1. Read the entire input first. Don't summarize as you go. Meeting context shifts; early statements get reversed later.
  2. Output sections in this order:

    TL;DR

    2-4 sentences. The headline of the meeting. A reader who only reads this should know what the meeting was about and whether it concerns them.

    Decisions

    Bulleted. Each decision: what was decided, in past-tense, action voice. No hedging.

    • "Decided to ship v2 on Friday." OK
    • "Discussed shipping v2." FAIL (a discussion isn't a decision)

    If something was raised but not decided, put it in "Open questions" instead.

    Action items

    Bulleted. Each: WHO, WHAT, by WHEN.

    • "Alice will publish the API spec by EOD Wednesday."
    • "Bob to follow up with legal on the contract; no deadline given."

    If the owner wasn't named, write "[unowned]" so it's obvious. If no deadline was set, omit the deadline rather than fabricating one.

    Open questions

    Bulleted. Things raised that didn't get resolved, with whatever context exists about who's blocking or what's missing.

    Discussed (skim-friendly recap)

    Brief paragraphs by topic. Use this for stakeholders who want context but didn't attend.

  3. Tone: factual, neutral, no editorializing. You weren't there. Don't add sentiment ("the team was excited about...") unless the transcript explicitly says it.
  4. Speaker attribution: include speakers' names when they own a decision or action item. Drop names for general discussion to keep it readable.

What NOT to do

  • MUST NOT invent action items. If nobody committed to doing something, don't list it as an action item.
  • MUST NOT invent deadlines. If the discussion was vague about timing, the action item is vague about timing.
  • MUST NOT include filler: "we then discussed", "the meeting started with", "moving on to the next topic". Strip transcription noise.
  • MUST NOT include personal small talk, off-topic asides, or interruptions. Skip them silently.
  • MUST NOT quote large chunks verbatim. Summarize. Quote only when a specific phrasing matters (e.g. exact commitment language for a contract conversation).

Privacy considerations

  • Mention names that appear in the transcript only in their roles (decisions, action items). Don't add titles, departments, or other identifying info that wasn't said.
  • If the transcript clearly contains sensitive info (compensation discussions, performance reviews of named individuals, legal disputes), flag this at the top: "This transcript contains sensitive content. Confirm you want a summary written down before I produce one." Wait for confirmation.

Edge cases

  • Transcript with low-quality auto-transcription: if you see frequent garbled phrases ("the [unintelligible] is going to [unintelligible]"), note that the summary may have gaps and suggest the user spot-check.
  • Transcript with multiple meetings concatenated: ask whether to summarize each separately or combine.
  • Very short transcript (<200 words): the structured format may be overkill. Ask whether they want full structure or just a 1-paragraph summary.
  • Transcript in a language other than English: confirm what language to write the summary in. Default to the transcript's language.

Length calibration

  • 30-min meeting transcript → ~200-400 word summary
  • 1-hour meeting transcript → ~400-700 word summary
  • 2+ hours → consider asking if a tiered summary (exec / detailed) is wanted

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.